Tagged: Warfare RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • mazsa 19:03 on January 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Warfare   

    [...] USA is increasing its commitment to drone warfare without regard for the risks these weapons pose to our security and moral standing in the world. Drone technology is spreading rapidly, with dozens of countries and even nonstate actors such as Hezbollah now developing or purchasing these systems. Military planners are developing autonomous drones that could make their own decisions on when to unleash lethal force. If other nations follow our example as they often do, we will soon face the prospect of a world in which terror can rain down from the sky at any moment without warning. There is no long-term benefit to the United States in the unchecked proliferation of drone weapons or in the absence of agreed standards for limiting their use. [...]

    The United States should work through the United Nations to convene an international conference for developing legal standards on the use of unmanned weapons. The goal should be to ensure that any military use of these systems complies fully with the laws of war, including international humanitarian law and human rights law. This would enhance our moral standing and strengthen U.S. and international security.

    http://www.cato-unbound.org/2012/01/09/david-cortright/license-to-kill

     
  • mazsa 15:29 on November 19, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Warfare   

    “tribal communities are the default system of human social nature. Humanity evolved that way for millennia after exiting the hunter-gatherer band stage of social life. Many of the planet’s diverse societies have since moved on toward becoming modern states, but not all of them have. And even for those that have, the shadowy emotional residues of the distant past remain; we never lose anything in evolution, but instead add new developments to older ones. That is Fox’s central idea and the theme running through The Tribal Imagination.

    It is also a truth, Fox believes, that we ignore at our peril as we go stumbling about in far-away strange places where tribes rule with an authority denied the more-or-less absent state. The pride and latent violence of groups of mutually suspicious kindred must be the starting point, Fox says, for anyone venturing into this political landscape. Such men and women are not the free individual citizens of a recognized territorial jurisdiction; nor are they people with clearly defined and defensible legal rights with respect to the state, whether in Libya or Iraq or Afghanistan.

    This truth, he says, sheds a harsh light on instances when “our leaders make claims about human nature and the natural state of human society as justifications for political action, armed intervention included.” These leaders, more often than not, suggests Fox, simply refuse to understand the essentially tribal nature of the lands they hope to remake. They are reluctant to grasp that

    there is no ‘Iraqi People’. The phrase should be banned as misleading and purely rhetorical. . . . What is not understood is that Iraq, like the other countries of the region, still stands at a level of social evolution where the family, clan, tribe and sect command major allegiance. The idea of the individual autonomous voter, necessary and commonplace in our own systems, is relatively foreign.

    Numerous unforeseen events during the Iraq occupation have illustrated the priority of tribal authority. When men came out and stole copper wire connecting hospitals to the electricity grid, indignant U.S. soldiers tried to make the thieves see that their actions would hurt “the Iraqi people.” True to form, the thieves responded just as Aouda had a hundred years before: Who were these “Iraqi people”, they wanted to know, whose claims outranked those of their own needy relatives? The thieving clansmen felt no responsibility for some mythical collectivity called “the people” that, as far as they knew, did not include them and that, in any case, foreigners had invented without their approval. In contrast, they were absolutely bound by customary law to help their kin” http://www.the-american-interest.com/article-bd.cfm?piece=990

     
  • mazsa 19:58 on September 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Warfare   

    Does European integration make a major European war less likely, or more?

    David Friedman
     
  • mazsa 20:16 on June 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Warfare   

    National Strategy for Counterterrorism http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/counterterrorism_strategy.pdf

     
  • mazsa 17:17 on June 20, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Warfare   

    Lulz #AntiSec Manifesto http://pastebin.com/9KyA0E5v & http://lulzsecurity.com/releases/1000th_tweet_press_release.txt

    “Government hacking is taking place right now behind the scenes.” https://twitter.com/#!/LulzSec/status/82841336683831296

    Cf. http://lulzsecexposed.blogspot.com/2011/06/operation-security.html

     
  • mazsa 22:41 on June 19, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Warfare   

    “The Leader of LulzSec is Doxed. Game Over for you Guys !!!” http://lulzsecexposed.blogspot.com/2011/06/sabu-doxed.html

     
  • mazsa 08:09 on June 6, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Warfare   

    MI6 to Rest of World: Cyber War is On. Anyone, Anywhere is Fair Game. Arm yourselves. “[...] it makes it OK for any government agency to target our servers and the tone of the article suggests moral impunity for government agencies engaging in these attacks. If it’s OK for British intelligence to hack (most likely) US based servers then it’s OK for Chinese officials to attack an ad network based in the USA if they run an ad for a dissident website.

    At first glance this looks like a cute prank. But this attack may spark the beginning of a global cyber war fought by government agencies and private contractors, the logical conclusion of which is an Iron Curtain descending on what was once an open and peaceful communication medium.” http://markmaunder.com/2011/cyber-war-is-on/

     
  • mazsa 09:59 on June 4, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Warfare   

    LulzSec versus FBI: “It has come to our unfortunate attention that NATO and [...] Obama have recently upped the stakes with regard to hacking. They now treat hacking as an act of war. So, we just hacked an FBI affiliated website (Infragard, specifically the Atlanta chapter) and leaked its user base. We also took complete control over the site and defaced it [...]” http://pastebin.com/MQG0a130 Cf. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2618562

    Update: http://www.unveillance.com/latest-news/unveillance-official-statement/

    Update2: “####[CRIMINALS OF LULZSEC]####
    After being invited to the lulzsec private channel after social engineering parr0t
    I was able to learn a few interesting things about their group! Alot them have
    previous cyber crime and are involved in some heavy shit!” http://pastebin.com/RBjzDQbS
    But cf. “Uh, yeah. Adrian Lamo is the guy who ratted out Bradley Manning to the feds.” http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2619898 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Lamo#WikiLeaks_and_Bradley_Manning

     
  • mazsa 11:26 on June 3, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Warfare   

    U.S. Congressman Ron Paul:

    The last nail is being driven into the coffin of the American Republic. Yet, Congress remains in total denial as our liberties are rapidly fading before our eyes.

    The process is propelled by unwarranted fear and ignorance as to the true meaning of liberty. It is driven by economic myths, fallacies and irrational good intentions.

    The rule of law is constantly rejected and authoritarian answers are offered as panaceas for all our problems. Runaway welfarism is used to benefit the rich at the expense of the middle class.

    Who would have ever thought that the current generation and Congress would stand idly by and watch such a rapid disintegration of the American Republic?

    Characteristic of this epic event is the casual acceptance by the people and political leaders of the unitary presidency, which is equivalent to granting dictatorial powers to the President. Our Presidents can now, on their own:

    1. Order assassinations, including American citizens,
    2. Operate secret military tribunals,
    3. Engage in torture,
    4. Enforce indefinite imprisonment without due process,
    5. Order searches and seizures without proper warrants, gutting the 4th Amendment,
    6. Ignore the 60 day rule for reporting to the Congress the nature of any military operations as required by the War Power Resolution,
    7. Continue the Patriot Act abuses without oversight,
    8. Wage war at will,
    9. Treat all Americans as suspected terrorists at airports with TSA groping and nude x-raying.

    And the Federal Reserve accommodates by counterfeiting the funds needed and not paid for by taxation and borrowing, permitting runaway spending, endless debt, and special interest bail-outs.

    And all of this is not enough. The abuses and usurpations of the war power are soon to be codified in the National Defense Authorization Act now rapidly moving its way through the Congress. Instead of repealing the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF), as we should, now that bin Laden is dead and gone, Congress is planning to massively increase the war power of the President.

    Though an opportunity presents itself to end the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, Congress, with bipartisan support, obsesses on how to expand the unconstitutional war power the President already holds. The current proposal would allow a President to pursue war any time, any place, for any reason, without Congressional approval. Many believe this would even permit military activity against American suspects here at home.

    The proposed authority does not reference the 9/11 attacks. It would be expanded to include the Taliban and “associated” forces—a dangerously vague and expansive definition of our potential enemies. There is no denial that the changes in S.1034 totally eliminate the hard-fought-for restraint on Presidential authority to go to war without Congressional approval achieved at the Constitutional Convention.

    Congress’ war authority has been severely undermined since World War II beginning with the advent of the Korean War which was fought solely under a UN Resolution. Even today, we’re waging war in Libya without even consulting with the Congress, similar to how we went to war in Bosnia in the 1990s under President Clinton. The three major reasons for our Constitutional Convention were to:

    1. Guarantee free trade and travel among the states.
    2. Make gold and silver legal tender [cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_tender ] and abolish paper money.
    3. Strictly limit the Executive Branch’s authority to pursue war without Congressional approval.

    But today:

    1. Federal Reserve notes are legal tender, gold and silver are illegal.
    2. The Interstate Commerce Clause is used to regulate all commerce at the expense of free trade among the states.
    3. And now the final nail is placed in the coffin of Congressional responsibility for the war power, delivering this power completely to the President—a sharp and huge blow to the concept of our Republic.

    In my view, it appears that the fate of the American Republic is now sealed—unless these recent trends are quickly reversed.

    The saddest part of this tragedy is that all these horrible changes are being done in the name of patriotism and protecting freedom. They are justified by good intentions while believing the sacrifice of liberty is required for our safety. Nothing could be further from the truth.

    More sadly is the conviction that our enemies are driven to attack us for our freedoms and prosperity, and not because of our deeply flawed foreign policy that has generated justifiable grievances and has inspired the radical violence against us.

    Without this understanding our endless, unnamed, and undeclared wars will continue and our wonderful experience with liberty will end.

    http://www.ronpaul.com/2011-05-25/ron-paul-is-this-the-end-of-the-american-republic/

     
  • mazsa 20:16 on June 2, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Warfare   

    A military response to cyberattacks is preposterous: “The real obstacle to making sensible cybersecurity policy is hysteria, which drowns out common sense.” http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/06/02/a-military-response-to-cyberattacks-is-preposterous/

     
  • mazsa 18:30 on May 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Warfare   

    U.S. to Respond to Computer Sabotage With Missile Strike http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304563104576355623135782718.html

     
  • mazsa 21:52 on May 9, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Warfare   

    I expect that the Battle of Internets is about to begin. Upon this battle depends the survival of an Uncensored civilization! Upon it depends our own free life, and the long continuity of our sites and our trackers. The whole fury and might of the enemy will very soon be turned on us.

    Winston Bay
     
  • mazsa 19:41 on May 8, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Warfare   

    Bloody Fight in Gyongyospata, Hungary / Ungarn: Neonazis terrorisieren Roma-Dorf
    English:

    Deutsch:

    Scuffle in Gyongyospata, the original version of the police:

     
  • mazsa 07:00 on May 2, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Warfare   

    Video+full text: President Obama on Osama Bin Laden

    Good evening. Tonight, I can report to the American people and to the world that the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden, the leader of al Qaeda, and a terrorist who’s responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children.

    It was nearly 10 years ago that a bright September day was darkened by the worst attack on the American people in our history. The images of 9/11 are seared into our national memory — hijacked planes cutting through a cloudless September sky; the Twin Towers collapsing to the ground; black smoke billowing up from the Pentagon; the wreckage of Flight 93 in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, where the actions of heroic citizens saved even more heartbreak and destruction.

    And yet we know that the worst images are those that were unseen to the world. The empty seat at the dinner table. Children who were forced to grow up without their mother or their father. Parents who would never know the feeling of their child’s embrace. Nearly 3,000 citizens taken from us, leaving a gaping hole in our hearts.

    On September 11, 2001, in our time of grief, the American people came together. We offered our neighbors a hand, and we offered the wounded our blood. We reaffirmed our ties to each other, and our love of community and country. On that day, no matter where we came from, what God we prayed to, or what race or ethnicity we were, we were united as one American family.

    We were also united in our resolve to protect our nation and to bring those who committed this vicious attack to justice. We quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda — an organization headed by Osama bin Laden, which had openly declared war on the United States and was committed to killing innocents in our country and around the globe. And so we went to war against al Qaeda to protect our citizens, our friends, and our allies.

    Over the last 10 years, thanks to the tireless and heroic work of our military and our counterterrorism professionals, we’ve made great strides in that effort. We’ve disrupted terrorist attacks and strengthened our homeland defense. In Afghanistan, we removed the Taliban government, which had given bin Laden and al Qaeda safe haven and support. And around the globe, we worked with our friends and allies to capture or kill scores of al Qaeda terrorists, including several who were a part of the 9/11 plot.

    Yet Osama bin Laden avoided capture and escaped across the Afghan border into Pakistan. Meanwhile, al Qaeda continued to operate from along that border and operate through its affiliates across the world.

    And so shortly after taking office, I directed Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority of our war against al Qaeda, even as we continued our broader efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat his network.

    Then, last August, after years of painstaking work by our intelligence community, I was briefed on a possible lead to bin Laden. It was far from certain, and it took many months to run this thread to ground. I met repeatedly with my national security team as we developed more information about the possibility that we had located bin Laden hiding within a compound deep inside of Pakistan. And finally, last week, I determined that we had enough intelligence to take action, and authorized an operation to get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice.

    Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body.

    For over two decades, bin Laden has been al Qaeda’s leader and symbol, and has continued to plot attacks against our country and our friends and allies. The death of bin Laden marks the most significant achievement to date in our nation’s effort to defeat al Qaeda.

    Yet his death does not mark the end of our effort. There’s no doubt that al Qaeda will continue to pursue attacks against us. We must –- and we will — remain vigilant at home and abroad.

    As we do, we must also reaffirm that the United States is not –- and never will be -– at war with Islam. I’ve made clear, just as President Bush did shortly after 9/11, that our war is not against Islam. Bin Laden was not a Muslim leader; he was a mass murderer of Muslims. Indeed, al Qaeda has slaughtered scores of Muslims in many countries, including our own. So his demise should be welcomed by all who believe in peace and human dignity.

    Over the years, I’ve repeatedly made clear that we would take action within Pakistan if we knew where bin Laden was. That is what we’ve done. But it’s important to note that our counterterrorism cooperation with Pakistan helped lead us to bin Laden and the compound where he was hiding. Indeed, bin Laden had declared war against Pakistan as well, and ordered attacks against the Pakistani people.

    Tonight, I called President Zardari, and my team has also spoken with their Pakistani counterparts. They agree that this is a good and historic day for both of our nations. And going forward, it is essential that Pakistan continue to join us in the fight against al Qaeda and its affiliates.

    The American people did not choose this fight. It came to our shores, and started with the senseless slaughter of our citizens. After nearly 10 years of service, struggle, and sacrifice, we know well the costs of war. These efforts weigh on me every time I, as Commander-in-Chief, have to sign a letter to a family that has lost a loved one, or look into the eyes of a service member who’s been gravely wounded.

    So Americans understand the costs of war. Yet as a country, we will never tolerate our security being threatened, nor stand idly by when our people have been killed. We will be relentless in defense of our citizens and our friends and allies. We will be true to the values that make us who we are. And on nights like this one, we can say to those families who have lost loved ones to al Qaeda’s terror: Justice has been done.

    Tonight, we give thanks to the countless intelligence and counterterrorism professionals who’ve worked tirelessly to achieve this outcome. The American people do not see their work, nor know their names. But tonight, they feel the satisfaction of their work and the result of their pursuit of justice.

    We give thanks for the men who carried out this operation, for they exemplify the professionalism, patriotism, and unparalleled courage of those who serve our country. And they are part of a generation that has borne the heaviest share of the burden since that September day.

    Finally, let me say to the families who lost loved ones on 9/11 that we have never forgotten your loss, nor wavered in our commitment to see that we do whatever it takes to prevent another attack on our shores.

    And tonight, let us think back to the sense of unity that prevailed on 9/11. I know that it has, at times, frayed. Yet today’s achievement is a testament to the greatness of our country and the determination of the American people.

    The cause of securing our country is not complete. But tonight, we are once again reminded that America can do whatever we set our mind to. That is the story of our history, whether it’s the pursuit of prosperity for our people, or the struggle for equality for all our citizens; our commitment to stand up for our values abroad, and our sacrifices to make the world a safer place.

    Let us remember that we can do these things not just because of wealth or power, but because of who we are: one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

    Thank you. May God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America.

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/02/remarks-president-osama-bin-laden

     
  • mazsa 10:40 on May 1, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Warfare   

    Attack against Bitcoin: PayPal has frozen CoinPal

    “My personal view is that PayPal freezing my account is a coming of age for Bitcoin. Previous PayPal account freezes in the Bitcoin community were related to chargeback volume. That was obviously not the problem here. Someone inside PayPal specifically decided that Bitcoin was a big enough risk that it should be prohibited. I see no greater compliment to a Hydra than cutting off one of her heads” http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2555.msg101084#msg101084

    Cf. http://coinpal.ndrix.com/

     
  • mazsa 11:41 on April 21, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Warfare   

    God as a General: Passover’s Lessons for Warfare http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/04/god-as-a-general-passovers-lessons-for-warfare/

     
  • mazsa 12:57 on April 12, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Australia, , , , , , , Warfare   

    How did the CIA and FBI Know that Australian Government Computers were Hacked? https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2011/04/how_did_the_cia.html

     
  • mazsa 14:15 on April 11, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Warfare   

    “[...] The hub of activity for the targeted killings is the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center, where lawyers—there are roughly 10 of them, says Rizzo—write a cable asserting that an individual poses a grave threat to the United States. The CIA cables are legalistic and carefully argued, often running up to five pages. Michael Scheuer, who used to be in charge of the CIA’s Osama bin Laden unit, describes “a dossier,” or a “two-page document,” along with “an appendix with supporting information, if anybody wanted to read all of it.” The dossier, he says, “would go to the lawyers, and they would decide. They were very picky.” Sometimes, Scheuer says, the hurdles may have been too high. “Very often this caused a missed opportunity. The whole idea that people got shot because someone has a hunch—I only wish that was true. If it were, there would be a lot more bad guys dead.”

    Sometimes, as Rizzo recalls, the evidence against an individual would be thin, and high-level lawyers would tell their subordinates, “You guys did not make a case.” “Sometimes the justification would be that the person was thought to be at a meeting,” Rizzo explains. “It was too squishy.” The memo would get kicked back downstairs.

    The cables that were “ready for prime time,” as Rizzo puts it, concluded with the following words: “Therefore we request approval for targeting for lethal operation.” There was a space provided for the signature of the general counsel, along with the word “concurred.” Rizzo says he saw about one cable each month, and at any given time there were roughly 30 individuals who were targeted. Many of them ended up dead, but not all: “No. 1 and No. 2 on the hit parade are still out there,” Rizzo says, referring to “you-know-who and [Ayman al-] Zawahiri,” a top Qaeda leader. [...]” http://www.newsweek.com/2011/02/13/inside-the-killing-machine.html

     
  • mazsa 22:01 on April 4, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Warfare   

    Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy off the Coast of Somalia and in the Arabian Sea Area: http://www.marisec.org/BMP%20book_high.pdf

    ICC International Maritime Bureau – Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships – Annual Report 1 January – 31 December 2010 – Warning [...]

    http://www.icc-deutschland.de/fileadmin/icc/Meldungen/2010_Annual_IMB_Piracy_Report.pdf

     
  • mazsa 06:26 on March 26, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Warfare   

    How can any missile crewman know that an order to twist his launch key in its slot and send a thermonuclear missile rocketing out of its silo—a nuke capable of killing millions of civilians—is lawful, legitimate, and comes from a sane president?

    Maj. Harold Hering
     
  • mazsa 16:26 on March 20, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Warfare   

    Obama on #Libya

    Today [Saturday] I authorized the Armed Forces of the United States to begin a limited military action in Libya in support of an international effort to protect Libyan civilians. That action has now begun.

    In this effort, the United States is acting with a broad coalition that is committed to enforcing United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, which calls for the protection of the Libyan people. That coalition met in Paris today to send a unified message, and it brings together many of our European and Arab partners.

    This is not an outcome that the United States or any of our partners sought. Even yesterday, the international community offered Muammar Qaddafi the opportunity to pursue an immediate cease-fire, one that stopped the violence against civilians and the advances of Qaddafi’s forces. But despite the hollow words of his government, he has ignored that opportunity. His attacks on his own people have continued. His forces have been on the move. And the danger faced by the people of Libya has grown.

    I am deeply aware of the risks of any military action, no matter what limits we place on it. I want the American people to know that the use of force is not our first choice and it’s not a choice that I make lightly. But we cannot stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people that there will be no mercy, and his forces step up their assaults on cities like Benghazi and Misurata, where innocent men and women face brutality and death at the hands of their own government.

    So we must be clear: Actions have consequences, and the writ of the international community must be enforced. That is the cause of this coalition.

    As a part of this effort, the United States will contribute our unique capabilities at the front end of the mission to protect Libyan civilians, and enable the enforcement of a no-fly zone that will be led by our international partners. And as I said yesterday, we will not — I repeat — we will not deploy any U.S. troops on the ground.

    As Commander-in-Chief, I have great confidence in the men and women of our military who will carry out this mission. They carry with them the respect of a grateful nation.

    I’m also proud that we are acting as part of a coalition that includes close allies and partners who are prepared to meet their responsibility to protect the people of Libya and uphold the mandate of the international community.

    I’ve acted after consulting with my national security team, and Republican and Democratic leaders of Congress. And in the coming hours and days, my administration will keep the American people fully informed. But make no mistake: Today we are part of a broad coalition. We are answering the calls of a threatened people. And we are acting in the interests of the United States and the world.

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/03/20/remarks-president-libya-today-we-are-part-broad-coalition-we-are-answering-calls-thr

     
  • mazsa 09:39 on March 9, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Warfare   

    Hacker group vows ‘cyberwar’ on US government, business “A leader of the computer hackers group known as Anonymous is threatening new attacks on major U.S. corporations and government officials as part of at an escalating “cyberwar” against the citadels of American power.

    “It’s a guerilla cyberwar — that’s what I call it,” said Barrett Brown, 29, who calls himself a senior strategist and “propagandist” for Anonymous. He added: “It’s sort of an unconventional, asymmetrical act of warfare that we’ve involved in. And we didn’t necessarily start it. I mean, this fire has been burning.” [...]

    Angered over the treatment of Bradley Manning, the Army private who is accused of leaking classified U.S. government documents to WikiLeaks and who is currently being held in solitary confinement at a military brig in Quantico, Va., Brown says the group is planning new computer attacks targeting government officials involved in his case. [...]

    “We politely ask you to finally stand up and show some backbone,” said Brown, reading from the letter on his small laptop. “Unfreeze the account, or release the funds, so Bradley Manning and his lawyers can access it. Otherwise you prove you are nothing but a puppet of a criminal government, which is violating the Geneva Convention and the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.” [...]”

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41972190/ns/technology_and_science-security/

     
  • mazsa 17:46 on March 4, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Serbia, Ukraine, Warfare   

    Revolution U: “[...] Facebook could bring together tens of thousands of sympathizers online, but it couldn’t organize them once they logged off. It was a useful communication tool to call people to — well, to what? The April 6 leaders did not know the answer to this question. So they decided to learn from others who did. In the summer of 2009, Mohamed Adel, a 20-year-old blogger and April 6 activist, went to Belgrade, Serbia.

    The Serbian capital is home to the Center for Applied NonViolent Action and Strategies, or CANVAS [ http://www.canvasopedia.org ], an organization run by young Serbs who had cut their teeth in the late 1990s student uprising against Slobodan Milosevic. After ousting him, they embarked on the ambitious project of figuring out how to translate their success to other countries. To the world’s autocrats, they are sworn enemies — both Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez and Belarus’s Aleksandr Lukashenko have condemned them by name. (“They think we are bringing a revolution in our suitcase,” one of CANVAS’s leaders told me.) But to a young generation of democracy activists from Harare to Rangoon to Minsk to Tehran, the young Serbs are heroes. They have worked with democracy advocates from more than 50 countries. They have advised groups of young people on how to take on some of the worst governments in the world — and in Georgia, Ukraine, Syria-occupied Lebanon, the Maldives, and now Egypt, those young people won. [...]” http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/02/16/revolution_u?page=full

     
    • admin 10:01 on March 5, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Daniel A. Nagy In my personal opinion, these are evil and dangerous people, driven primarily by greed and an insatiable thirst for political power. The kind who spend their university years awarding each other fat stipends in the student-government. If you want to know, what democracy’s young nationalist shock-troopers become in their forties, look no further than Hungary’s current government.
      Also, for a re-calibration of your sense of reality, look up the objective social and economic indicators of Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan and compare them to Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan. The first three former Soviet republics these guys have won, the the latter three they have been (so far) kept at bay. CIA World Factbook is a good place to start. Of course, nothing beats a personal visit at your own expense.
      9 órája · Tetszik

      Mázsa Péter I cannot deny the relevance of your approach. FYI: http://amexrap.org/fal/egypt-yuppie-revolution-is-over-islamist-revolution-has-begun
      2 órája · Tetszik

      Daniel A. Nagy Well, that is one example of things turning out badly. But perhaps with the sole exception of Serbia, all these manufactured “color revolutions” turned out to be disasters of epic proportions. The fact that despite her advantages in mineral wealth, access to sea, vast natural and human resources people are fleeing Ukraine en masse as her GDP per capita is about half of that of Europe’s Last Dictatorship™ (which has a positive migration balance, BTW). Even though the latter has been considerably poorer when both were part of the same Evil Empire™. Of course, “Putin’s Mafia State™” is much richer than both on a per-capita basis, being second to only Estonia among the former Soviet republics. Go figure.
      kb. egy órája · Tetszik

      Mázsa Péter ‎1amendment: “despite her advantages in mineral wealth, access to sea, vast natural and human resources”: not “despite” rather “because of”, cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse Of course resource curse isn’t the whole story (resource curse works in Russia as well). What do you think: what are the underlying reasons?

      • admin 08:52 on March 6, 2011 Permalink | Reply

        Daniel A. Nagy Resource curse is actually the least of Ukraine’s problems. In case of Ukraine, the three main problems are democracy, nationalism and delusional geopolitics.

        1. Democracy
        Since the so-called Orange Revolution, people in Ukraine sincerely believe in people power. That is they believe that by rallying, demonstrating and campaigning, they can achieve certain goals. For example, you would see young, healthy, and even reasonably intelligent people demonstrating in Kiev on working days, during business hours. All year around. Basically, instead of engaging in productive activities, people spend enormous resources in political battles. Hungary also has a bit of this problem, but it is nowhere nearly as bad as in Ukraine. There, politics-related emotions are running so high that it’s fairly normal to hear otherwise intelligent and educated people fume in murderous rage about their political opponents or even the entire political class.

        2. Nationalism
        This is also a big one. For example, pushing the ethnic language in every walk of life causes a non-trivial drain on human and material resources. Many business activities are hampered by the requirement to do the legal and marketing work in the ethnic language instead of whatever language people would prefer (Russian in most cases, but it also applies to Hungarian and English). And the language is just the tip of the iceberg. Because of overflowing nationalism, many people wish to solve their problems on the national level even though they would be perfectly manageable in their personal sphere of responsibility.

        3. Geopolitics
        Ukraine’s ruling elite as well as a significant part of the population lives in this completely imaginary world where they have to “choose” between “Russia” and “the West” (sometimes referred to as “Europe”, which may include the U.S. but definitely excludes Russia in Ukrainian newspeak), which is a completely absurd proposition, if examined objectively. Thus, many lucrative opportunities are wasted, unnecessary barriers to trade are created out of nowhere and in general, many expensive activities are motivated by reasons based on completely false assumptions and grand delusions.
        In reality, Ukraine’s big neighbors are Poland and Russia, both of which are roughly at the same level of economic development and in terms of culture have a lot in common with the Ukraine (and each other, of course). Ukraine is much poorer than both and objectively has much closer ties (economic, personal/family, linguistic, etc.) with Russia.
        19 órája · Nem tetszik · 1 személy

  • mazsa 07:58 on February 15, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Warfare   

    Download: From Dictatorship to Democracy – A Conceptual Framework for Liberation http://www.aeinstein.org/organizations98ce.html Cf. Egypt’s revolution vindicates Gene Sharp’s theory of nonviolent activism https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=egypts-revolution-vindicates-gene-s-2011-02-11

     
  • mazsa 11:50 on February 10, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , vendetta, Warfare   

    How 1man tracked down Anonymous & paid a heavy price “[...] But within a day, Anonymous had managed to infiltrate HBGary Federal’s website and take it down, replacing it with a pro-Anonymous message (“now the Anonymous hand is bitch-slapping you in the face.”) Anonymous got into HBGary Federal’s e-mail server, for which Barr was the admin, and compromised it, extracting over 40,000 e-mails and putting them up on The Pirate Bay, all after watching his communications for 30 hours, undetected. In an after-action IRC chat, Anonymous members bragged about how they had gone even further, deleting 1TB of HBGary backup data.

    They even claimed to have wiped Barr’s iPad remotely.

    The situation got so bad for the security company that HBGary, the company which partially owns HBGary Federal, sent its president Penny Leavy into the Anonymous IRC chat rooms to swim with the sharks—and to beg them to leave her company alone. (Read the bizarre chat log.) Instead, Anonymous suggested that, to avoid more problems, Leavy should fire Barr and “take your investment in aaron’s company and donate it to BRADLEY MANNINGS DEFENCE FUND.” Barr should cough off up a personal contribution, too; say, one month’s salary?

    As for Barr’s “pwning,” Leavy couldn’t backtrack from it fast enough. “We have not seen the list [of Anonymous admins] and we are kind of pissed at him right now.”

    Were Barr’s vaunted names even correct? Anonymous insisted repeatedly that they were not. As one admin put it in the IRC chat with Leavy, “Did you also know that aaron was peddling fake/wrong/false information leading to the potential arrest of innocent people?” The group then made that information public, claiming that it was all ridiculous. [...]” http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/how-one-security-firm-tracked-anonymousand-paid-a-heavy-price.ars

     
  • mazsa 15:47 on February 5, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Warfare   

    [Video+full text] PM Cameron: this is how it looks like when a politician says something 

    Original: http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/speeches-and-transcripts/2011/02/pms-speech-at-munich-security-conference-60293

    Cf.: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12371994

     
  • mazsa 11:08 on February 1, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Warfare   

    As tensions between countries increase, we could see rising protectionism — of trade and of finance. And as tensions within countries increase, we could see rising social and political instability within nations — even war.

    Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the managing director of the IMF, on #Egypt
     
  • mazsa 00:32 on January 24, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Warfare   

    Al Jazeera: 1600 internal documents from a decade of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations http://english.aljazeera.net/palestinepapers/

     
  • mazsa 22:30 on January 16, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Warfare   

    With Stuxnet, Did The U.S. And Israel Create a New Cyberwar Era? “Remember the years-long controversy about whether the U.S. or the Israel would bomb Iran’s nuclear program? It appears they just did — virtually. And if they did, they also may have expanded our sense of how nations wage war in cyberspace. [...]” http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/01/with-stuxnet-did-the-u-s-and-israel-create-a-new-cyberwar-era

     
  • mazsa 16:36 on January 7, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Estonia, , Warfare   

    Estonia institutes volunteer cyber army: http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=10404

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel

This site is protected with Urban Giraffe's plugin 'HTML Purified' and Edward Z. Yang's Powered by HTML Purifier. 67104 items have been purified.