Tagged: Al-Qaeda RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • mazsa 07:00 on May 2, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Al-Qaeda, ,   

    Video+full text: President Obama on Osama Bin Laden

    Good evening. Tonight, I can report to the American people and to the world that the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden, the leader of al Qaeda, and a terrorist who’s responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children.

    It was nearly 10 years ago that a bright September day was darkened by the worst attack on the American people in our history. The images of 9/11 are seared into our national memory — hijacked planes cutting through a cloudless September sky; the Twin Towers collapsing to the ground; black smoke billowing up from the Pentagon; the wreckage of Flight 93 in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, where the actions of heroic citizens saved even more heartbreak and destruction.

    And yet we know that the worst images are those that were unseen to the world. The empty seat at the dinner table. Children who were forced to grow up without their mother or their father. Parents who would never know the feeling of their child’s embrace. Nearly 3,000 citizens taken from us, leaving a gaping hole in our hearts.

    On September 11, 2001, in our time of grief, the American people came together. We offered our neighbors a hand, and we offered the wounded our blood. We reaffirmed our ties to each other, and our love of community and country. On that day, no matter where we came from, what God we prayed to, or what race or ethnicity we were, we were united as one American family.

    We were also united in our resolve to protect our nation and to bring those who committed this vicious attack to justice. We quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda — an organization headed by Osama bin Laden, which had openly declared war on the United States and was committed to killing innocents in our country and around the globe. And so we went to war against al Qaeda to protect our citizens, our friends, and our allies.

    Over the last 10 years, thanks to the tireless and heroic work of our military and our counterterrorism professionals, we’ve made great strides in that effort. We’ve disrupted terrorist attacks and strengthened our homeland defense. In Afghanistan, we removed the Taliban government, which had given bin Laden and al Qaeda safe haven and support. And around the globe, we worked with our friends and allies to capture or kill scores of al Qaeda terrorists, including several who were a part of the 9/11 plot.

    Yet Osama bin Laden avoided capture and escaped across the Afghan border into Pakistan. Meanwhile, al Qaeda continued to operate from along that border and operate through its affiliates across the world.

    And so shortly after taking office, I directed Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority of our war against al Qaeda, even as we continued our broader efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat his network.

    Then, last August, after years of painstaking work by our intelligence community, I was briefed on a possible lead to bin Laden. It was far from certain, and it took many months to run this thread to ground. I met repeatedly with my national security team as we developed more information about the possibility that we had located bin Laden hiding within a compound deep inside of Pakistan. And finally, last week, I determined that we had enough intelligence to take action, and authorized an operation to get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice.

    Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body.

    For over two decades, bin Laden has been al Qaeda’s leader and symbol, and has continued to plot attacks against our country and our friends and allies. The death of bin Laden marks the most significant achievement to date in our nation’s effort to defeat al Qaeda.

    Yet his death does not mark the end of our effort. There’s no doubt that al Qaeda will continue to pursue attacks against us. We must –- and we will — remain vigilant at home and abroad.

    As we do, we must also reaffirm that the United States is not –- and never will be -– at war with Islam. I’ve made clear, just as President Bush did shortly after 9/11, that our war is not against Islam. Bin Laden was not a Muslim leader; he was a mass murderer of Muslims. Indeed, al Qaeda has slaughtered scores of Muslims in many countries, including our own. So his demise should be welcomed by all who believe in peace and human dignity.

    Over the years, I’ve repeatedly made clear that we would take action within Pakistan if we knew where bin Laden was. That is what we’ve done. But it’s important to note that our counterterrorism cooperation with Pakistan helped lead us to bin Laden and the compound where he was hiding. Indeed, bin Laden had declared war against Pakistan as well, and ordered attacks against the Pakistani people.

    Tonight, I called President Zardari, and my team has also spoken with their Pakistani counterparts. They agree that this is a good and historic day for both of our nations. And going forward, it is essential that Pakistan continue to join us in the fight against al Qaeda and its affiliates.

    The American people did not choose this fight. It came to our shores, and started with the senseless slaughter of our citizens. After nearly 10 years of service, struggle, and sacrifice, we know well the costs of war. These efforts weigh on me every time I, as Commander-in-Chief, have to sign a letter to a family that has lost a loved one, or look into the eyes of a service member who’s been gravely wounded.

    So Americans understand the costs of war. Yet as a country, we will never tolerate our security being threatened, nor stand idly by when our people have been killed. We will be relentless in defense of our citizens and our friends and allies. We will be true to the values that make us who we are. And on nights like this one, we can say to those families who have lost loved ones to al Qaeda’s terror: Justice has been done.

    Tonight, we give thanks to the countless intelligence and counterterrorism professionals who’ve worked tirelessly to achieve this outcome. The American people do not see their work, nor know their names. But tonight, they feel the satisfaction of their work and the result of their pursuit of justice.

    We give thanks for the men who carried out this operation, for they exemplify the professionalism, patriotism, and unparalleled courage of those who serve our country. And they are part of a generation that has borne the heaviest share of the burden since that September day.

    Finally, let me say to the families who lost loved ones on 9/11 that we have never forgotten your loss, nor wavered in our commitment to see that we do whatever it takes to prevent another attack on our shores.

    And tonight, let us think back to the sense of unity that prevailed on 9/11. I know that it has, at times, frayed. Yet today’s achievement is a testament to the greatness of our country and the determination of the American people.

    The cause of securing our country is not complete. But tonight, we are once again reminded that America can do whatever we set our mind to. That is the story of our history, whether it’s the pursuit of prosperity for our people, or the struggle for equality for all our citizens; our commitment to stand up for our values abroad, and our sacrifices to make the world a safer place.

    Let us remember that we can do these things not just because of wealth or power, but because of who we are: one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

    Thank you. May God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America.

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/02/remarks-president-osama-bin-laden

     
  • mazsa 14:15 on April 11, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Al-Qaeda, ,   

    “[...] The hub of activity for the targeted killings is the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center, where lawyers—there are roughly 10 of them, says Rizzo—write a cable asserting that an individual poses a grave threat to the United States. The CIA cables are legalistic and carefully argued, often running up to five pages. Michael Scheuer, who used to be in charge of the CIA’s Osama bin Laden unit, describes “a dossier,” or a “two-page document,” along with “an appendix with supporting information, if anybody wanted to read all of it.” The dossier, he says, “would go to the lawyers, and they would decide. They were very picky.” Sometimes, Scheuer says, the hurdles may have been too high. “Very often this caused a missed opportunity. The whole idea that people got shot because someone has a hunch—I only wish that was true. If it were, there would be a lot more bad guys dead.”

    Sometimes, as Rizzo recalls, the evidence against an individual would be thin, and high-level lawyers would tell their subordinates, “You guys did not make a case.” “Sometimes the justification would be that the person was thought to be at a meeting,” Rizzo explains. “It was too squishy.” The memo would get kicked back downstairs.

    The cables that were “ready for prime time,” as Rizzo puts it, concluded with the following words: “Therefore we request approval for targeting for lethal operation.” There was a space provided for the signature of the general counsel, along with the word “concurred.” Rizzo says he saw about one cable each month, and at any given time there were roughly 30 individuals who were targeted. Many of them ended up dead, but not all: “No. 1 and No. 2 on the hit parade are still out there,” Rizzo says, referring to “you-know-who and [Ayman al-] Zawahiri,” a top Qaeda leader. [...]” http://www.newsweek.com/2011/02/13/inside-the-killing-machine.html

     
  • mazsa 13:54 on March 24, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Al-Qaeda   

    Al Qaeda loves the places where there is no strong democratic, national power.

    Taieb Fassi-Fihri, Moroccan FM
     
  • mazsa 09:49 on September 11, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Al-Qaeda, , , , , , , ,   

    Nine years after 9/11, let’s stop playing into bin Laden’s hands: “The attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, succeeded far beyond anything Osama bin Laden could possibly have envisioned. This is not just because they resulted in nearly 3,000 deaths, nor only because they struck at the heart of American financial and military power. Those outcomes were only the bait; it would remain for the United States to spring the trap.

    The goal of any organized terrorist attack is to goad a vastly more powerful enemy into an excessive response. And over the past nine years, the United States has blundered into the 9/11 snare with one overreaction after another. Bin Laden deserves to be the object of our hostility, national anguish and contempt, and he deserves to be taken seriously as a canny tactician. But much of what he has achieved we have done, and continue to do, to ourselves. Bin Laden does not deserve that we, even inadvertently, fulfill so many of his unimagined dreams. [...]

    If bin Laden did not foresee all this, then he quickly came to understand it. In a 2004 video message, he boasted about leading America on the path to self-destruction. “All we have to do is send two mujaheddin . . . to raise a small piece of cloth on which is written ‘al-Qaeda’ in order to make the generals race there, to cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses.”

    Through the initial spending of a few hundred thousand dollars, training and then sacrificing 19 of his foot soldiers, bin Laden has watched his relatively tiny and all but anonymous organization of a few hundred zealots turn into the most recognized international franchise since McDonald’s. Could any enemy of the United States have achieved more with less?

    Could bin Laden, in his wildest imaginings, have hoped to provoke greater chaos? It is past time to reflect on what our enemy sought, and still seeks, to accomplish — and how we have accommodated him.”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/09/AR2010090904735.html

     
  • mazsa 09:30 on April 14, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Al-Qaeda, , , , , ,   

    “The issue with terrorists getting nukes is not what they have done in the past (zero) but how rapidly it can change the risk profile when they do use a nuke. Scenario: terrorists use a nuclear device on a major city in the US and kill 1 million. This makes the new annual fatality risk in the US equal to 1/300 which is comparable to WWII at the top of the chart.” Vs. “Scenario: Everybody eats cake. Saying it might happen does not a risk analysis make.”:) Comments of Omar Fink and arturus on http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/04/terrorist_attac.html

    “Briefing by Press Secretary Robert Gibbs and Assistant to the President for Counterterrorism and Homeland Security John Brennan

    MR. BRENNAN:  Good afternoon, everyone.  The threat of nuclear terrorism is real, it is serious, it is growing, and it constitutes one of the greatest threats to our national security and, indeed, to global security.
    Over the past two decades there has been indisputable evidence that dozens of terrorist groups have actively sought some type of weapon of mass effect.  Relative to other such potential weapons — which include biological, chemical, radiological — the consequences and impact of a nuclear attack would be the most devastating as well as the most lasting.

    Thus, the ability to obtain a nuclear weapon and to use it is the ultimate and most prized goal of terrorist groups. 

    Al Qaeda is especially notable for its longstanding interest in acquiring weapons-useable nuclear material and the requisite expertise that would allow it to develop a yield producing improvised nuclear device.

    Al Qaeda has been engaged in the effort to acquire a nuclear weapon for over 15 years, and its interest remains strong today. 

    [...]

    Q    First, Mr. Brennan, if you could clarify again this ongoing threat that you were talking about from these terrorist groups, al Qaeda, is there anything specific now that intelligence is telling you that this threat exists — not just general threat over the last 10 years or the last 5 years, but anything actively going on now that intelligence can point to?

    MR. BRENNAN:  I think you can point to a lot of al Qaeda activities and public statements that underscore their determination to carry out attacks against U.S., Western interests, as well as the interests of other countries and nations.  And there is a significant amount of intelligence that underlies those statements and those assessments that are public.

    Al Qaeda has demonstrated this determination and also extreme patience in going after particular types of capabilities.  And we know for certain that there are individuals that have been within al Qaeda that have been given this responsibility.  This is a very, very tough challenge though for us to be able to look worldwide to see where al Qaeda might be undertaking biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear programs.

    And so there is intelligence that indicates that al Qaeda continues its murderous agenda and continues to look toward WMD capabilities in order to carry out that agenda.

    [...]

    MR. BRENNAN:  [Discussions have] been taking place over the past 15 months at the expert level to identify all the parts of the broader nuclear security architecture that we really need to make sure is as strong as possible.

    Q    But those commitments are non-binding, are they not?  I mean, there’s no general enforcement mechanism or enforcement out there.  These are agreements that nations to made to each other.  What is the means by which to check to verify that these commitments are being met?

    MR. GIBBS:  Well, I can assure you that over the course of the next two years, as I said, the United States will provide whatever technical assistance is necessary to ensure that the movement of very dangerous and not easy to handle material — that that’s accomplished.  I mean, Major, look, there’s — we’re not signing any formal mechanism today, but I would say the commitments made between those two leaders, the President feels confident in — in understanding as well what we’ll then begin to  provide, along with other nations in the world, for the ability to lock this stuff down.

    […]

    Q    Just to follow up on the previous questions about the timing, should they get possession of this material, how long would it take a group like al Qaeda to produce weapon?  I mean, is there any estimate?  Because it seems not a very easy process anyway.  Look at Iran and, you know, it’s taking years.  So what is your assessment in terms of timing?

    MR. BRENNAN:  Well, I’ve talked before about the various weapons of mass effect, whether it be biological, chemical, radiological, and nuclear.  Radiological, a dirty bomb — this is a way that al Qaeda could try to carry out a nuclear-type event, but it wouldn’t have — it wouldn’t produce a yield; it wouldn’t be a nuclear blast.
    So those materials may be available –

    Q    (Inaudible.)

    MR. BRENNAN:  Mass effect — well, you can have the psychological effects that are attendant to some type of WMD attack.  And so a chemical attack, a biological attack, you can have tremendous effect, but the destruction in terms of lives might be limited.  A nuclear attack, though, an improvised nuclear device, and that’s probably the way they would go as they — if they were able to acquire this fissile material, a lot depends on the material they were able to get, the expertise that they had, but I think they would be damned determined to try to move in that direction.  They have already said publicly that if they acquired that type of weapons capability, that they would use it.
    I don’t want to test the proposition of that — that they would take a certain period of time to create such a weapon.  What we want to do is, again, try to focus on denying them the opportunity to use those materials for weapons of mass effect purposes.

    MR. GIBBS:  Yes, sir.

    Q    (Inaudible) — terms of vulnerability, military, nuclear sides to the civil nuclear energy sector.  What gives you the bigger concerns, that somebody steals nuclear weapons from a military site worldwide?  Or rather, let’s say, hijack, for example, the transport of highly enriched based?  Which is often transported (inaudible) — cities all over the world.  What’s the bigger concern?

    MR. BRENNAN:  Well, we have concerns both on the civilian and military side from the standpoint of facilities as well as transport as well as the security measures that are put in place at these respective facilities.  Al Qaeda and other groups, including criminal groups, are going to be looking for what avenues present them the best opportunity to acquire these materials.  And so they and a lot of these criminal gangs and terrorist organizations reside in countries where there are nuclear programs, including some that are part of nuclear weapons programs.
    And so what we’re trying to do is to make sure that we’re able to stay several steps ahead of terrorist groups by working with these countries to make sure that they’re able to button down their facilities, but also take the appropriate steps and to institute the protocols that are necessary that will endure over time.  This is not just a one-time event here — what we’re trying to do is continue this process that’s been underway for a number of years that we can truly help to safeguard these materials.

    Q    Every day tons are transported worldwide.  Tons.

    [Cf. Testimony of Dr. Henry Kelly, President Federation of American Scientists before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations March 6, 2002 http://fas.org/ssp/docs/kelly_testimony_030602.pdf ]

    MR. BRENNAN:  A lot of things are transported on a regular basis.  What we need to do is to make sure that it’s done in the most secure fashion possible.  And that’s what part of the dialogue that is taking place with other countries to ensure that as they move materials they are doing it fully aware of the vulnerabilities and the potential opportunities that terrorists might use to take advantage of that transport.

    […]

    Q    Why not going through the United Nations for — there is a convention on protection of nuclear materials.  It is kind of creating a parallel mechanism.

    MR. GIBBS:  I’m sorry, say the second part again.

    Q    You’re creating a parallel mechanism.

    [Cf. http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/482

    MR. GIBBS:  No, I don’t — again, we’re — 46 countries are represented here, as well as a series of international organizations that the President believes are necessary to do this.  So I don’t think in any way this is duplicative.  I think the President sees the strong concern for — and John reiterated the type of — the President reiterated the threat, John reiterated the types of groups that are seeking to control this type of material.  And I think the President strongly believes that we must do everything in our power and that that is certainly not duplicative of what the United Nations seeks to do.”

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/briefing-press-secretary-robert-gibbs-and-assistant-president-counterterrorism-and-

    Key documents: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/04/13/enormously-productive-day

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel

This site is protected with Urban Giraffe's plugin 'HTML Purified' and Edward Z. Yang's Powered by HTML Purifier. 66557 items have been purified.