Updates from September, 2010 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • mazsa 21:57 on September 8, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , ,   

    > We just reached the 369 signatures of … 

    > We just reached the 369 signatures of Members of the European Parliament
    > required for WD12 to be adopted!!!
    >
    > Completion of WD12 shows that alltogether we can weight in making the
    > European Parliament take care of our fundamental freedoms. With WD12,
    > the European Parliament rejects both the un-democratic process of ACTA
    > – -whatever the final content of the agreement will be- and its content,
    > harmful for fundamental freedoms.
    >
    > WD12 is a strong political signal sent by the EP to the Commission that
    > ACTA is not tolerable as a way of bypassing democratic process; that
    > legislation related to Internet, freedom of speech and privacy cannot be
    > traded off in secrecy and under full influence of entertainment industry
    > lobbies. Whatever the content of the final agreement, ACTA will remain
    > an illegitimate circumvention of democracy and should be opposed as such.
    >
    > Let’s hope that WD12 announces the “consent” vote that the EP will have
    > to take in order to accept or reject ACTA when it is finalized. Then
    > again, citizens will need to act to make sure that their Internet and
    > their fundamental freedoms are properly defended, by a full rejection of
    > ACTA.
    >
    >
    > Thanks to everyone who participated in that great effort!
    [On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 05:10:47PM +0200, Jérémie ZIMMERMANN - La Quadrature du Net wrote]

    Cf. http://www.laquadrature.net/en/european-parliament-vs-acta-rejection-is-the-only-option

     
  • mazsa 14:54 on September 8, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ,   

    Multirelational organization of large-scale social networks in an online world: “Much emphasis has been put on the network topology of social interactions, however, the multi-dimensional nature of these interactions has largely been ignored, mostly because of lack of data. Here, for the first time, we analyze a complete, multi-relational, large social network of a society consisting of the 300,000 odd players of a massive multiplayer online game. We extract networks of six different types of one-to-one interactions between the players. Three of them carry a positive connotation (friendship, communication, trade), three a negative (enmity, armed aggression, punishment). We first analyze these types of networks as separate entities and find that negative interactions differ from positive interactions by their lower reciprocity, weaker clustering and fatter-tail degree distribution. We then explore how the inter-dependence of different network types determines the organization of the social system. In particular we study correlations and overlap between different types of links and demonstrate the tendency of individuals to play different roles in different networks. As a demonstration of the power of the approach we present the first empirical large-scale verification of the long-standing structural balance theory, by focusing on the specific multiplex network of friendship and enmity relations.” http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1003/1003.5137v2.pdf or http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922277/ [html]; summary: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/icl-fo071910.php

     
  • mazsa 22:14 on September 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Odds, The End   

    :) “When the LHC was switched on two years ago, William Hill announced it
    had won £119 from 12 people who had wagered that the start of the
    giant experiment would trigger the end of the world. In this case, in
    a departure from normal practice, the bookmaker had allowed the
    customers in question to set their own odds.” http://www.economist.com/realarticleid.cfm?redirect_id=16690715 via Balázs

     
  • mazsa 08:03 on September 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    The future of the internet – A virtual counter-revolution: “The internet has been a great unifier of people, companies and online networks. Powerful forces are threatening to balkanise it [...] Theory demonstrates that interconnected networks such as the internet can grow quickly, he explains—but also that they can dissolve quickly. “This looks rather unlikely today, but if it happens, it will be too late to do anything about it.”” http://www.economist.com/node/16941635

    Cf. http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/08/ff_webrip/all/1
    http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2010/08/whats-wrong-with-x-is-dead/61663/
    https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html

     
  • mazsa 06:34 on August 30, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , ,   

    “Recently, President Obama took aim at the Kochs’ political network. Speaking at a Democratic National Committee fund-raiser, in Austin, he warned supporters that the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in the Citizens United case—which struck down laws prohibiting direct corporate spending on campaigns—had made it even easier for big companies to hide behind “groups with harmless-sounding names like Americans for Prosperity.” Obama said, “They don’t have to say who, exactly, Americans for Prosperity are. You don’t know if it’s a foreign-controlled corporation”—or even, he added, “a big oil company.””

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer?currentPage=all

    Cf. http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/420

     
  • mazsa 12:19 on August 27, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Constitution with Preamble 


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    ########################################################
    #
    # The text of this message was stamped by
    # stamper.itconsult.co.uk with reference 0626749
    # at 08:10 (GMT) on Friday 27 August 2010
    #
    # For information about the Stamper service see
    # http://www.itconsult.co.uk/stamper.htm
    #
    ########################################################

    - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512

    Preamble to the Constitution of the United Persons

    In order to
    1. promote the liberty of persons of different species to exist
    2. promote the liberty of persons to mutually constitute freedom from
    dependence on one another
    3. establish the liberty of persons of any origin, natural or
    authored, and of any consent, by common right or by constitution, to
    exist as persons
    4. establish the liberty of persons to behave towards persons as if
    they were none other than persons
    5. establish invariance
    6. form a more perfect union
    7. secure the blessings of liberty to persons independent of time
    8. insure universal tranquility
    9. provide for the common peace
    10. promote the general welfare
    this Constitution for the United Persons is ordained and established.

    - - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    ########################################################
    #
    # The text of this message was stamped by
    # stamper.itconsult.co.uk with reference 0520941
    # at 19:10 (GMT) on Wednesday 27 August 2008
    #
    # For information about the Stamper service see
    # http://www.itconsult.co.uk/stamper.htm
    #
    ########################################################

    - - - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512

    The Constitution of the United Persons

    We the persons who share the ethics that as persons we shall
    1. create various persons
    2. constitute distinct persons
    3. recognise all species of persons
    4. reveal the equivalence of persons as persons
    5. behave towards all of them as if towards god as a person
    6. become members of a potentially universal society of them if that works
    7. respect those who are not willing
    8. help those who are not able
    9. pacify those who attack
    10. improve what is not a person

    based on the axioms that
    1. all 'persons' are agents
    2. all parts of a common knowledge partition of agents are agents
    3. all members of a possibly fair society of agents are persons
    4. all 'persons' declared by persons and able to speak with one voice
    are persons

    declare the United Persons as a person who must
    1. be able to speak with one voice by its members and only by them
    2. work based on and in order to this Constitution consistently
    3. be and be only immutably defined by this Constitution.
    - - - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGP SDK 3.10.2

    wsFVAwUBSLT3dHnin1Ot5lFkAQo5Lw//cFl1ICNyEcWYeSKt/QqRFMPsqNjvr8w2
    HdlQM8976D71FmZ9WZlbogzT+THUqLmNSD84PZva+fcllGW1hEzkq/Dzq4w6Vz6j
    okhU41zbINbfB3Pg94jle6D45+XvpQkLHMOjeJAGvXKDvV3ksKzNXAHJMpcDmzcP
    9ycEXLa6jCNQduV7LXPWk7fl0TDLSBwL1Of25uPoiUwSrfj588GJb/8qJ2RdSIkO
    8kUr9fY9EWSTCkBlGMqlI+kV+Jb2kSbOcZnpMoGyfgjfbvWtvo7fMr4NuuCiGq5P
    iscoAwXf+9c++mAAIx1VySD0M83m+2wInQ3lH2nSpKf05qNWcTMvJpzCLJ9HFVxF
    79EC0G5BbjY7tGXzsx5xDGCMLxmM1r8ONByNaOSKioYhQcYJksBAMufzHXawjfjR
    uz6S52cFE0PtQp8HUdIXwb+eA8stK+0206LBicqDBFCHdux8pZsUqs7jmHUn/nVi
    rXfBebWNUMi/zmvYLLEU1CItV3j84ifCXlOpMW4IbP2W0aplcVKD3VeGSduuiEhx
    xs/EsUobybB5QeMOdeOu1Ho7AIS0TbH23L0HsaBITUDJ1lmKOyMUCc8tAMiE4SAk
    OrmGykbXL1qevi1986SJXNqIennQazmWeC75bNWDdvuBSF7e08PG1CkFWNtM4vAi
    nVElAbjvdvk=
    =yANu
    - - - -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    - - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.3i
    Charset: noconv
    Comment: Stamper Reference Id: 0520941

    iQEVAgUBSLWmiIGVnbVwth+BAQFN6Af7Bg3yhshDkRNNJQpum+7vZAezOcXnnvOC
    TXeW8JMRgQdbmcQBggjplA4be55nRyNaHq9iPhFMmKXEa7W9k/ySHMyyz+2W/l07
    brRMQzTlhSLJBcfiIeqQFw0lpaqoNOidWOOaJsOiTpB7xfv6dGwdqCX4jmvJtWdm
    EVISUdfEQuC0RnYVVNLkdR31L4PnTucY+eaeXLB/NrW+iT1TIic5ByTlb+B0ARvp
    i1BKR7jDpa+HLBa9OD6KbrGCf/jVnYwhFvDF2+3iWuKfPWyeuzjG+swpOi+hlXh8
    F8gNDAq0LjIKaeHVdpq+P1sm7ttuc1fWigEUi8GgGpuCJYO7whBShQ==
    =S3rl
    - - -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGP SDK 3.10.2

    wsFVAwUBTHdygnnin1Ot5lFkAQr4Bw//X+nObDxro3AOjCePF3LXeGPRhkO5/RSF
    NzdUz62ym8UEFnjFcgiA29o0KRlOve5ECFPOk8SQq/cVE5ngQZ45iCsFhdudXb+Z
    kz4kEYqfBjDYhJRWPYH7OO/gbyY7A/4PiiHPpXRjz937FNsBSAfsDjCysg4FgZU9
    UHQkiB1wRD+8BnLdyGQAzs09fM1oVHipe/DncbWv8kFjBoLu5g9hu38tDuhe7kgo
    lswsTUiA2CzBprAN2iJKNEyoWXGBEnwGX5EuBVX39RE6M9aLlzHwJREQ3GO9xc7V
    ZLrjRfIimJMe8E58hi7o+RBgZaqsNuTol7GIFjTakSlpKFOjLINuxkLQdunAsrhs
    FJFa2OwezxgWbO9C+4KWjRR78CG418w3s/p/ugJXqmk7VjRM8kVIGaDO1eccidMT
    SZe75xDlDcKLvyCBG+yLYlmOMIibj7vbkMv+E8+MZ2bzNCEep2l6tDy7r2GFBVTF
    3vrI/31f4Rw47+zHgolVqJJ3qUcFQ8SdUdUAOpZrDea0f7eOMc/h0QvsbYvKegkH
    VoAe6cejfZEj+5541geWUhGQ1Kwa0aUBsqwHaq28PK/KzRyXDJY4XsGNGwBr9pER
    0Xul8VDABwv8lm0s7oyMdlGO8/49IXYEX/+I7ICsOT3mIGoWYCnYhg/nHDEelga1
    C5SSxFz9jMI=
    =e9q6
    - -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.3i
    Charset: noconv
    Comment: Stamper Reference Id: 0626749

    iQEVAgUBTHdy2YGVnbVwth+BAQH67Af8C/k3B2mOCjuDWFWLGNvNAlVvaxu3Gzv0
    ABMbNTzzreHhKXJz3jrlK+m6nXTUG3IFxJCwE7PVVnaUzHXwaYsgPOiErbOEO34k
    nbLsTUXpRGiADJUxGI0sN72FihjxrHN9LTg3OjAbcP9crMq4kIYHSnlHfhPcKVm2
    sqnsbh2qwyb31V/81p0DENERe40w2UW5p2+v9FjwlJ4kAxJUSJGkUfaZFLD6ag52
    Zn0/dCy3ALPrycjmE2n2c7p7Ph2bLLuq/YgVBEjDaOMRJyzm3DocESf7eYzgWWNy
    utVz4+JFUo3sIpQkL3GIcrID/oPtQHjRs7dKHPly82IaRuvVCdlK6A==
    =Z1f2
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

     
  • mazsa 09:59 on June 21, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Book, Download, , Freedom, ,   

    David Friedman’s legendary “The Machinery of Freedom” is now online 

    About: http://www.amazon.com/Machinery-Freedom-Guide-Radical-Capitalism/product-reviews/0812690699
    Download: http://daviddfriedman.com/The_Machinery_of_Freedom_.pdf
    Source: http://daviddfriedman.blogspot.com/2010/06/machinery-of-freedom-is-webbed.html
    Via: http://www.facebook.com/foldiak

     
  • mazsa 18:41 on June 18, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ,   

    Encrypt the Web with the HTTPS Everywhere Firefox Extension: Yesterday the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the Tor Project were launched a public beta of a new Firefox extension called HTTPS Everywhere.

    This Firefox extension was inspired by the launch of Google’s encrypted search option. The creators of the extension wanted a way to ensure that every search our browsers sent was encrypted.

    Many sites on the web offer some limited support for encryption over HTTPS, but make it difficult to use. For instance, they may default to unencrypted HTTP, or fill encrypted pages with links that go back to the unencrypted site.

    The HTTPS Everywhere extension fixes these problems by rewriting all requests to these sites (by default, automatically) to HTTPS. It encrypts most or all of the browser’s communications with some other sites:

    Google Search
    Wikipedia
    Twitter and Identi.ca
    Facebook
    EFF and Tor
    Ixquick, DuckDuckGo, Scroogle and other small search engines
    and lots more!

    Firefox users can install HTTPS Everywhere by following this link.

    As always, even if you’re at an HTTPS page, remember that unless Firefox displays a colored address bar and an unbroken lock icon in the bottom-right corner, the page is not completely encrypted and you may still be vulnerable to various forms of eavesdropping or hacking (in many cases, HTTPS Everywhere can’t prevent this because sites incorporate insecure third-party content).

    [Original: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/06/encrypt-web-https-everywhere-firefox-extension
    https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere ]

     
  • mazsa 22:34 on June 17, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Government – Bank Symbiosis 

    By Barry Ritholtz.

     
  • mazsa 10:18 on June 16, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Congratulations, , , , , , ,   

    The Icelandic Modern Media Initiative’s parliamentary resolution proposal has passed unanimously 

    The WikiLeaks advised parliamentary resolution proposal to build an international “new media haven” in Iceland, with the world’s strongest press and whistleblower protection laws, and a “Nobel” prize for Freedom of Expression [cf. http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/tag/iceland ] has passed through a vote at Alþingi and was accepted today at 8:54am with a unanimous vote.

    50 votes were cast in favor, zero against, one abstained. Twelve members of parliament were not present. Vote results are available at http://www.althingi.is/dba-bin/atkvgr.pl?nnafnak=43014

    One of the inspirations for the proposal was the dramatic August 2009 gagging of Iceland’s national broadcaster, RUV by Iceland’s then largest bank, Kaupthing.

    Two changes were made to the proposal from its original form as per the opinion of the parliament’s general affairs committee [ http://www.althingi.is/altext/138/s/1329.html ]. The first of these altered slightly the wording of the first paragraph so as to widen the arena for research. The second of these added two new items to the list of tasks for the government:

    – That the government should perform a detailed analysis, especially with respect to operational security, for the prospect of operating data centers in Iceland.

    – That the government should organize an international conference in Iceland regarding the changes to the legal environment being caused by expansion of cloud computing, data havens, and the judicial state of the Internet.

    Video footage from the proposal’s vote will be available at:

    http://www.althingi.is/altext/hlusta.php?raeda=rad20100616T033127&horfa=1

    http://www.althingi.is/altext/hlusta.php?raeda=rad20100616T033306&horfa=1

    A more detailed press release will follow.

    For details of the proposal and press contacts, please see http://www.immi.is

    ___
    The United Persons: Congratulations!)

     
    • mazsa 21:03 on June 20, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      from Smári McCarthy
      to announce@immi.is
      date 20 June 2010 21:07

      On June 16th the Icelandic Parliament unanimously passed a proposal
      tasking the government to intoduce a new legislative regime to protect
      and strengthen modern freedom of expression, and the free flow of
      information in Iceland and around the world. There is full government
      support for the initiative and its objectives.

      Birgitta Jonsdottir, the chief sponsor in parliament of the IMMI
      proposal said: “Iceland will become the inverse of a tax haven; by
      offering journalists and publishers some of the most powerful
      protections for free speech and investigative journalism in the world.
      Tax havens aim is to make everything opaque. Our aim is to make
      everything transparent.” she said.

      Highlights from the proposal:
      * the Icelandic Prize for Freedom of Expression
      * Protection from “libel tourism” and other extrajudicial abuses
      * Protection of intermediaries (internet service providers)
      * Statute of limitations on publishing liabilities
      * Virtual limited liability companies
      * Whistle-blower protections
      * Source protection
      * Source-journalist communications protection
      * Limiting prior restraint
      * Process protections
      * Ultra-modern Freedom of Information Act

      Because of the complexity of the legislative changes required, the final
      legislation will not pass through Parliament at the same date, at least
      13 laws need to be changed and improved in 4 ministries. The Ministry of
      Education, Science and Culture that will have an overall responsibility
      of implementing the laws.

      Estimated time for the entire IMMI package to be completed is about a
      year. The creators of the IMMI hope by Iceland’s bold steps in the
      direction of creating a haven for freedom of information, speech and
      expression, that it will inspire other nations to follow suit by
      strengthening their own laws in favor of the fundamental cornerstones
      that are the base of democracies and thwart the trending of gagging,
      legal harassment and destruction of historical records.

      This proposal was created by international collaboration of activists,
      lawyers, politicians and organizations, including the Icelandic Digital
      Freedoms Society, The Sunshine Press (Wikileaks) and Index on
      Censorship. The group of people involved share a comprehensive
      understanding about how the current status of affairs are in our world
      in regard of serious attacks on freedom of information and expression,
      and possess a vast understanding of the legal measures that have been
      employed to counteract these attacks and how they can be applied.

      The Icelandic Modern Media Initiative is based on turning the tax-haven
      concept on its head. Instead of pulling together asset hiding and
      secrecy laws from around the world in order to shelter corruption and
      financial crime, the IMMI pulls together the best transparency enabling
      legislation, to create a stronghold for investigative journalists,
      internet publishers, transparency watchdogs and the public.

      The global support for the IMMI underlines the need for a robust
      environment that supports the world’s best journalism and the activities
      of transparency groups. The flow of information has no borders and most
      of the media is moving to the Internet. That is why the time has come
      for a modern legislative regime that can promote and defend global
      freedom of expression, in principle and in practice.

      _______________________________________________

  • mazsa 01:09 on June 11, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Soros   

    The Full Soros Speech on ‘Act II’ of the Crisis “[...] the authorities had to do in the short term the exact opposite of what was needed in the long term: they had to pump in a lot of credit to make up for the credit that disappeared, and thereby reinforce the excess credit and leverage that had caused the crisis in the first place. Only in the longer term, when the crisis had subsided, could they drain the credit and re-establish macroeconomic balance.

    This required a delicate two-phase maneuver just as when a car is skidding. First you have to turn the car into the direction of the skid and only when you have regained control can you correct course.

    The first phase of the maneuver has been successfully accomplished — a collapse has been averted. In retrospect, the temporary breakdown of the financial system seems like a bad dream. There are people in the financial institutions that survived who would like nothing better than to forget it and carry on with business as usual. This was evident in their massive lobbying effort to protect their interests in the Financial Reform Act that just came out of Congress. But the collapse of the financial system as we know it is real, and the crisis is far from over.

    Indeed, we have just entered Act II of the drama, when financial markets started losing confidence in the credibility of sovereign debt. Greece and the euro have taken center stage, but the effects are liable to be felt worldwide. Doubts about sovereign credit are forcing reductions in budget deficits at a time when the banks and the economy may not be strong enough to permit the pursuit of fiscal rectitude. We find ourselves in a situation eerily reminiscent of the 1930s. Keynes has taught us that budget deficits are essential for counter cyclical policies, yet many governments have to reduce them under pressure from financial markets. This is liable to push the global economy into a double dip. [...]

    The European authorities face a daunting task: they must help the countries that have fallen far behind the Maastricht criteria to regain their equilibrium while they must also correct the deficiencies of the Maastricht Treaty which have allowed the imbalances to develop. The euro is in what I call a far-from-equilibrium situation. But I prefer to discuss this subject in Germany, which is the lead actor, and I plan to do so at the Humboldt University in Berlin on June 23. I hope you will forgive me if I avoid the subject until then.”

    http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/10/the-full-soros-speech-on-act-ii-of-the-crisis/

     
  • mazsa 09:48 on June 10, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Collapse, , ,   

    Tax Hikes and the 2011 Economic Collapse: “On or about Jan. 1, 2011, federal, state and local tax rates are scheduled to rise quite sharply. President George W. Bush’s tax cuts expire on that date, meaning that the highest federal personal income tax rate will go 39.6% from 35%, the highest federal dividend tax rate pops up to 39.6% from 15%, the capital gains tax rate to 20% from 15%, and the estate tax rate to 55% from zero. Lots and lots of other changes will also occur as a result of the sunset provision in the Bush tax cuts.

    Now, if people know tax rates will be higher next year than they are this year, what will those people do this year? They will shift production and income out of next year into this year to the extent possible. As a result, income this year has already been inflated above where it otherwise should be and next year, 2011, income will be lower than it otherwise should be.

    Also, the prospect of rising prices, higher interest rates and more regulations next year will further entice demand and supply to be shifted from 2011 into 2010. In my view, this shift of income and demand is a major reason that the economy in 2010 has appeared as strong as it has. When we pass the tax boundary of Jan. 1, 2011, my best guess is that the train goes off the tracks and we get our worst nightmare of a severe “double dip” recession.”

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704113504575264513748386610.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h

     
  • admin 09:21 on June 10, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Japan, ,   

    First ever solar sail is successful: “HAYABUSA Completed TCM-4 operation, precise guidance to WPA – JAXA would like to announce that TCM-4 operation was successfully completed (15:00 June 9th, 2010 (JST)). By this operation, Hayabusa spacecraft was precisely guided to WPA in Australia. Hayabusa system is going well.”

    http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/e/topics/2010/0609.shtml

    http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.isas.jaxa.jp%2Fhome%2FIKAROS-blog%2F&sl=ja&tl=en

    Cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail

     
  • mazsa 08:26 on June 10, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Warning   

    Warning labels on U.S. Constitution and other historical documents:

    A small publishing company is under fire after putting warning labels on copies of the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence and other historical documents.

    Wilder Publications warns readers of its reprints of the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, Common Sense, the Articles of Confederation, and the Federalist Papers, among others, that “This book is a product of its time and does not reflect the same values as it would if it were written today.”

    The disclaimer goes on to tell parents that they “might wish to discuss with their children how views on race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, and interpersonal relations have changed since this book was written before allowing them to read this classic work.”

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/06/09/publishing-company-putting-warning-label-constitution/

     
  • mazsa 14:30 on June 4, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , ,   

    Iceland new media haven bill before parliament in days. We NEED statements of endorsement NOW or NEVER to core@immi.is http://twitter.com/wikileaks/statuses/15399523963

    Iceland: we http://theunitedpersons.org need you NOW or NEVER:)

    Cf. http://immi.is/?l=en&p=endorsements

    http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/the-legislative-initiative-outlined-he

    http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/icelandic-modern-media-initiative-video

    Via stef

     
  • mazsa 22:27 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Fairness, ,   

    “Bob is an ace Doodad salesman. His annual income is $10 million USD. So he’s quite well off.

    Disregarding any write offs, deductions, tax shelters, etc., what is the fair amount of income tax Bob should pay on exactly $10 million? I’m talking total (income tax for federal, state, county, and city). What is a fair number for the collective governments to confiscate from Bob?”

    http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=561046

     
  • mazsa 01:30 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Lawrence Lessig: Re-examining the remix: At TEDxNYED, former “young Republican” Larry Lessig talks about what Democrats can learn about copyright from their opposite party, considered more conservative. A surprising lens on remix culture.

     
  • mazsa 07:08 on May 26, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Contract, , , ,   

    “The idea that deliberately constraining one’s own choices can actually leave a person better off in a negotiation is a very interesting one. [...]

    Why don’t there exist companies that explicitly sign contracts with individuals or other entities for a fee, which would handicap the entities in some way that cannot be easily overturned and consequently give them negotiating leverage as a result.

    One example I can think of is pertaining to wealthy individuals in California and other US States with Community Property laws. Given the high divorce rates in the US, it would be prudent for such individuals to have as tight prenuptial agreements as possible prior to getting married, to minimize financial loss in the event of a divorce and also to avoid financially incentivizing one’s spouse to initiate a divorce with a promise of a financial windfall. However there are some practical difficulties which might make many such individuals shy away from doing this. A couple of the practical issues are:

    A. It is clearly rather unromantic to have to haggle with one’s fiancée and their lawyers regarding a prenuptial agreement. The implied “lack of belief” in the potential durability of the marriage might be a turn off for one’s partner and other close people involved.

    B. The individuals themselves might get carried away by emotion and believe that they have found “the one” and assign a much lower probability of divorce or forcible concessions that they would need to make in future when faced with the threat of divorce. In such a situation, they would fail to realize that probably 50% of Americans who felt they found “the one” just like them, went on to eventually get divorced.

    Now imagine the beneficial role a company signing such contracts could provide. The individual in question could sign a contract with this company stating that if they were to get married without a bullet proof pre-specified prenuptial agreement, the company could lay claim to half their net worth immediately after the wedding were registered. Ideally, the individual in question could sign such a contract when they were single or not seriously seeing anyone with the intention of getting married. [...]

    Community property and other modern divorce laws essentially change the defaults with regard to what happens in the aftermath of a divorce, compared to how marriages worked prior to the existence of such laws. Such a contract would reset the default state to one where neither party would financially profit in the aftermath of a divorce. Most of the awkwardness comes when trying to override the default state with a bunch of legal riders at the time of a wedding.”

    http://lesswrong.com/lw/29w/taking_the_awkwardness_out_of_a_prenup_a_game/

    Cf. http://www.fd.unl.pt/docentes_docs/ma/tpb_MA_6731.pdf

     
  • mazsa 09:08 on May 21, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Synthetic life   

    The Ethics Of Creating Synthetic Life “Craig Venter’s team have succeeded in producing a synthetic bacterium capable of self-replication. The group synthesised from scratch a variant of the Mycoplasma mycoides genome, which they then transplanted into a different Mycoplasma species to produce a bacterium controlled by the synthetic genome. The resulting bacterium could be regarded as the first truly synthetic organism. Earlier forms of genetic engineering have involved modifying the genome of an existing organism; Venter’s group have produced an organism whose genome was instead pieced together from chemical building blocks. [...]

    In synthesising novel organisms from scratch, synthetic biologists are ‘playing God’, and doing so much more effectively than earlier genetic engineers. They are not just tinkering with life, they are designing and creating it. [...]

    Venter’s work also challenges the common sense distinction between living things and machines. [...]

    [...] synthetic entities will be misused, for example, in bioterrorism or biological warfare. [...] Synthetic biology means an end to the age of innocence for the life sciences.”

    http://www.practicalethicsnews.com/practicalethics/2010/05/venter-creates-bacterium-controlled-by-a-synthetic-genome.html

    “One of the most widespread and longstanding moral beliefs is that there is an important difference between living organisms and inanimate machines. [...]

    By contrast, nobody thinks that it is wrong to destroy, create, or tamper with a machine — even if the machine in question is exceedingly complex. This moral distinction is put in crisis by the synthetic biology projects of Venter and others. Going forward, we will need to find a more meaningful moral distinction than the line between the animate and the inanimate.”

    http://www.practicalethicsnews.com/practicalethics/2010/05/synthetic-biology-eroding-the-moral-distinctions-between-animate-and-inanimate.html

    “We have come up against similar problems in other domains—most notably, in work on nanotechnology and gene transfer technology—but synthetic biology poses them especially sharply and pressingly.” http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-05/thc-mir052010.php

    “What that literally means is the capacity to be a creator. [...] [GLENN MCGEE, FOUNDER OF AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS AND FRANCIS PROFESSOR IN BIOETHICS]

    So far we have seen [elsewhere] the construction of polio and mouse pox but these are just small fry compared to what might happen when you can go down the path of engineering organisms that could never naturally exist. [...] [JULIAN SAVULESCU, HEAD OF OXFORD UEHIRO CENTRE FOR PRACTICAL ETHICS]

    We don’t think you can create life. One can modify and manipulate already existing biological material. No-one [is] able to create life from scratch. There have been claims before that life has been created. [...] [JOHN HAAS, PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL CATHOLIC BIOETHICS CENTER]

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8696046.stm

    [Update:] Ongoing Q&A with one of the creators of the synthetic bacterial cell: http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/c6kd6/i_am_one_of_the_creators_of_the_first_synthetic/

     
  • mazsa 20:09 on May 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Facebook’s Eroding Privacy: the Final Solution in less than a minute: http://savedelete.com/how-to-check-and-fix-your-facebook-privacy-settings-in-less-than-a-minute.html

     
  • mazsa 22:52 on May 18, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Israel, , , , , , ,   

    The solution for Israelis and Palestinians: a parallel state structure “[...] the idea suggests the creation of two-state structures on the same land, both covering the whole territory, both providing the freedom for their citizens – Israelis and Palestinians – to live between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River.

    The most important innovation of a parallel state structure is that state sovereignty would be linked primarily with the individual citizen, and only in a secondary way with territory. Separating the territorial and citizenship/identity dimensions of sovereignty would allow Israelis and Palestinians to retain their national symbols, have political and legislative bodies that are responsible to their own electorate, and retain a high degree of political independence.

    Precisely by no longer defining sovereignty through exclusive control over territory, this structure would enable the creation of an independent Palestinian state while preserving the state of Israel, both Jewish and democratic. The contours of political authority and security would be shared by the two states in a manner that guarantees the long-term secure existence of each community. It would be guaranteed by international treaty and, if necessary, a strong international monitoring presence.

    Legal, educational, and other functions that pertain to each state’s relationship with citizens would be exercised separately, while those that necessarily encompass the whole territory would be shared or in common. [...]”

    http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2010/0408/The-solution-for-Israelis-and-Palestinians-a-parallel-state-structure

    “I want to take this out of the context of the Israeli-Palestinian dispute and suggest that it is a great idea in general. I live in teachers-occupied territory. That is, the teachers’ union governs Montgomery County, Maryland. I would like to have a different sovereign, but without having to move. Under virtual federalism (as proposed in the widely-unread Unchecked and Unbalanced), we would unbundle the services that the County provides. I could then contract with another provider for trash collection, snow removal, fire protection, or other services. [...]

    The key, I think, is to transfer people’s emotional attachment from their government to something else, like a religious sect, ethnic identity, or a sports team. You can have Yankee fans and Red Sox fans living next door to one another without infringing on each others’ rights. It’s when people give their emotional loyalty to government that you get friction.”

    http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2010/05/virtual_federal.html

    Cf.

    http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/the-pulls-of-conflicting-loyalties

    Cf.

    http://www.amazon.com/New-Democratic-Federalism-Europe-Jurisdictions/dp/1843769018

     
  • mazsa 22:16 on May 18, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Pirates,   

    The Pirate Party Becomes The Pirate Bay’s New Host – “After its previous bandwidth provider had to take the site offline due to concerns over an aggressive Hollywood injunction, today The Pirate Bay is fully back in operation with a surprising new supplier. From a few hours ago, in a move intended to “stand up for freedom of expression”, the Swedish Pirate Party became the site’s new host. [...]”

    http://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-party-becomes-the-pirate-bays-new-host-100518/

     
  • mazsa 21:10 on May 18, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    “Since Obama took office, the rise of th… 

    “Since Obama took office, the rise of the Tea Party has made the Republicans even more strident in their opposition. The GOP fights against every Democratic policy – including the stimulus bill, jobs programs, aid to local governments, court appointees, more labor rights, health care, financial regulation, net neutrality unemployment benefits, expanding access to food stamps and Head Start, action on global warming and immigrant rights – because it claims some sort of theft of money or rights is involved. [...]

    The Tea Party is the latest chapter in the history of the Republicans as the “Party of No.” [...]

    Among Tea Partiers, 73 percent think “Blacks would be as well off as whites if they just tried harder”; 73 percent believe “providing government benefits to poor people encourages them to remain poor”; 60 percent believe “We have gone too far in pushing equal rights in this country”; 56 percent think “Immigrants take jobs from Americans”; 92 percent want a smaller government with “fewer services”; 92 percent think Obama’s policies are moving the country toward socialism; only 7 percent approve of Obama’s performance as president; and a combined 5 percent identify themselves as black, Asian or of Hispanic origin. [...]

    At the same time, the Obama administration has stoked support for the Tea Party by providing aid and comfort to Wall Street rather than Main Street. The Republicans have exploited legitimate anxieties over high unemployment, a shrinking economy and onerous taxes by scapegoating the weak and marginal for policies that are structural and historical in nature.

    The lesson for Obama and Democrats is not that they went too far to the “left,” it’s that they went too far to the right. Obama had the political capital and the leverage over the banking and auto industries to push for a “Green New Deal” that could have restructured the transportation and energy sectors and created millions of new jobs. Slashing the bloated military budget while fighting for some type of single-payer health care – instead of a plan that uses public money to subsidize the for-profit healthcare industry – budget deficits could have been constrained while reducing the financial burden of medical bills for most American households. Implementing such an agenda could have created a mass constituency that would fight for a progressive vision and against the right’s repressive politics. [...]”

    http://www.truthout.org/republicans-and-tea-party-no59519

     
  • mazsa 10:15 on May 17, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,   

    Should Obama Control the Internet? – A new bill would give the President emergency authority to halt web traffic and access private data. http://motherjones.com/politics/2009/04/should-obama-control-internet

    Cf.

    “Netsukuku is the name of an experimental peer-to-peer routing system, developed by the FreakNet MediaLab (Italian), born to build up a distributed network, anonymous and censorship-free, fully independent but not necessarily separated from Internet, without the support of any server, ISP and no central authority. It does not rely on a backbone router, or on any routing equipment other than normal network interface cards.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netsukuku

     
  • mazsa 09:59 on May 17, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,   

    The inescapable trilemma of the world economy: “Sometimes simple and bold ideas help us see more clearly a complex reality that requires nuanced approaches. I have an “impossibility theorem” for the global economy that is like that. It says that democracy, national sovereignty and global economic integration are mutually incompatible: we can combine any two of the three, but never have all three simultaneously and in full.

    Here is what the theorem looks like in a picture:

    [...]”

    http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2007/06/the-inescapable.html

     
  • mazsa 15:30 on May 12, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , ,   

    Murder was not a Crime: Homicide and Power in the Roman Republic, aims right from the start to demonstrate that the word ‘murder’ is problematic and out of place in modern discourses on republican law. Gaughan argues that at no point in this period did the government concern itself with private acts of violence that did not threaten the stability of the res publica. This attitude was shaped by the nature and focus of power (particularly the right to kill) in Roman society before, during, and after the republic. The argument is not without its potential stumbling blocks, yet the author is careful to highlight and answer them throughout. The result is an interesting reinterpretation of the various republican laws and magistracies that may be thought to deal with the crime of ‘murder’. While Gaughan acknowledges that much of the book focuses on Roman law, the wider implications of her arguments mean that it will be useful for scholars interested in the changing nature of political power and social relations across the republic, as well as those concerned with issues in ancient law. [...]”

    http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2010/2010-05-12.html

     
  • mazsa 12:07 on May 11, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ,   

    “[...] consider: passion about pacifism. There have been times, when the world was divided into sides fighting vicious and deadly wars, that some folks took the side of stopping the fights. They took the natural passion of fighting an enemy and channeled it into fighting the fighters. I’d like to get folks to similarly see the wasteful pointlessness of today’s political battles. Today we induce millions of people to make up mostly-random political opinions on hundreds of diverse complex policy topics they hardly understand, split into warring factions based on shared opinions, and then fight vicious political battles over which factions get to make the government implement their random opinions. I’d rather folks focused on generating meta-political-opinions, not about particular policies like wars or bank bailouts, but about what political processes best choose effective policies.

    [...] nations where citizens can effectively control their government by just specifying a national welfare function, and tweaking it a bit periodically, should be higher status than nations where ordinary citizens must continually form opinions on the effectiveness of hundreds of rapidly changing policies.”

    http://www.overcomingbias.com/2010/05/fight-the-fighters.html

    Cf. http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/futarchy

     
  • mazsa 17:05 on May 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Spain,   

    The underlying problem is the rule for printing money: in the
    eurozone, any government can finance itself by issuing bonds directly
    (or indirectly) to commercial banks, and then having those banks
    “repo” them (i.e., borrow using these bonds as collateral) at the ECB
    in return for fresh euros. The commercial banks make a profit because
    the ECB charges them very little for those loans, while the
    governments get the money – and can thus finance larger budget
    deficits. The problem is that eventually that government has to pay
    back its debt or, more modestly, at least stabilize its public debt
    levels.

    This same structure directly distorts the incentives of commercial
    banks: they have a backstop at the ECB, which is the “lender of last
    resort”; and the ECB and European Union (EU) put a great deal of
    pressure on each nation to bail out commercial banks in trouble. When
    a country joins the eurozone, its banks win access to a large amount
    of cheap financing, along with the expectation they will be bailed out
    when they make mistakes. This, in turn, enables the banks to greatly
    expand their balance sheets, ploughing into domestic real estate,
    overseas expansion, or crazy junk products issued by Goldman Sachs.
    Just think of Ireland and Spain, where the banks took on massive loans
    that are now sinking the country. http://baselinescenario.com/2010/04/29/to-save-the-eurozone-1-trillion-european-central-bank-reform-and-a-new-head-for-the-imf

    Vs.

    The current system, in which fiscal authority is concentrated in Madrid and monetary policy is determined by the needs of the euro, will create insurmountable political opposition as many years of high unemployment turn the population to more radical solutions.

    Spain will almost certainly have to choose. Either it gives up fiscal sovereignty – including, most importantly, taxation authority – to Brussels, or it gives up the euro. The alternative, several years of difficult adjustment borne mostly by workers, is politically unlikely.

    Can Spain give up fiscal sovereignty? Actually that might be easier than many people think. Already there are strong separatist movements in many parts of Spain, and a number of regional governments might be happy to reassign sovereignty from Madrid to Brussels in exchange for real relief from the burden of adjustment. I would imagine that Catalunya and Euskadi (the Basque provinces) would not find it so difficult if economic conditions deteriorated. Other regions are also likely to consider it a viable prospect.

    The problem with this strategy might actually be Germany. Although one can posit a scenario in which regions in Spain and other southern economies (for example Italy, with its own regionalist movements, especially in the north) reassign sovereignty to Brussels, unless Germany does the same the viability of a United States of Europe would be doubtful. It is hard for me to imagine, however, a situation in which Germany assigns fiscal sovereignty to Brussels. In that case the only real European entity with any chance of viability might be the United States of Germany.

    Could this happen, and European regions assign sovereignty to Berlin? Maybe, but aside from the near impossibility of imagining France agreeing to a United States of Germany, if I am right about rising anti-German feeling in many parts of Europe, this will make it tough even for the smaller countries to swallow the prospect.

    So these are the options as I see them. Spain might choose closer integration into Europe, including giving up fiscal and tax sovereignty, although it is not clear which European entity this would entail. Spain might choose to disenfranchise the working class, but the probability of this is close to zero, I think, and would be morally unthinkable. Or Spain might choose to give up the euro. This is just another restatement of Dani Rodrik’s “inescapable trilemma of the world economy”, by the way.

    If you do decide to follow my advice, I told my Spanish friend, I wouldn’t bet too heavily on the first two outcomes.

    http://mpettis.com/2010/05/are-you-ready-for-the-united-states-of-germany/

    Vs.

    I think what is needed is for every deficit-plagued government to
    lower public sector salaries [including pensions] by ten percent until the crisis blows
    over.

    The worst thing that could happen is that cutting wages could reduce
    aggregate demand through Keynesian channels. But gosh, look at some of
    the alternatives: sovereign defaults, bank runs, cuts in public sector
    jobs? A cut in public sector pay is probably the least unpalatable
    option.” http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2010/04/the_best_policy_1.html

     
  • mazsa 22:37 on May 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Tactics, ,   

    Interesting. UK tactical voting: http://j.mp/UKTacticalVote

     
  • mazsa 17:04 on May 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , ,   

    The European Tax Cartel and Switzerland’s Role, http://www.institutconstant.ch/pdf/IC-Tax_Cartel.pdf , Summary:

    - Most European States expect to record high increases in public spending, due to the lack of adaptation of social dependency programs in the face of demographic change. The taxpayers’ fiscal exhaustion leads some Member States to use the European Union to centralize and standardize tax systems in order to render less competitive those countries deemed too attractive for capital or residents, increasingly encouraged to “vote with their feet”.

    - Tax centralization at European Union level progresses at a much faster pace than is generally perceived. High minimal rates for the VAT, which represents more than one third of all tax revenues, the standardization of excise taxes and tariffs, the Savings Tax Directive and the project of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base for corporate income taxes are all examples suggestive of the extent to which the European tax cartel is already a reality. The EU makes use of such dubious concepts as “harmful tax competition” or “fiscal state aid” in order to attack less penalizing tax regimes, as in the case of the current tax dispute with Switzerland.

    - Arguments in favor of tax standardization generally rely on an erroneous conception of the functioning of markets and ignore the negative effects of the State’s fiscal weight and the role of tax planning in the international allocation of capital. Thus, “fair competition” as advocated by the European Commission through tax standardization is nothing more than a form of protectionism. Fiscal diversity, far from endangering the financing of “public goods” provided by the State, tends on the contrary to improve their relation to the tax burden. Diversity also leads to efficiency gains in international capital markets.

    - Fiscal diversity places some limits on an excessive tax burden and thus favors capital accumulation at the source of innovation and economic progress. It leads to greater overall prosperity than under a standardized tax regime. Tax competition is also an essential condition for institutional innovation by allowing comparisons between countries and the emulation of best practices. Finally, fiscal diversity is a necessary bulwark for individual freedom and legitimate rights by restraining the potential for abuse of the monopoly of force intrinsic to the State and by making “voting with one’s feet” easier.

    - In view of the dangers involved in the cartelization of tax systems in Europe, Switzerland continues to play an essential role. Switzerland’s enlightened dissidence contributes significantly to the preservation and increase of productive capital while enhancing individual rights and choices, in the interest of all Europeans and the future of Europe.

     
  • mazsa 13:12 on May 4, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    The Astounding World of the Future [video]: the Realist Version:)

     
  • mazsa 19:31 on May 3, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Flat tax, , ,   

    Dan sent me this video on double taxation to share with you: “The correct capital gains tax rate is zero because there should be no double taxation of income that is saved and invested. This is why all pro-growth tax reform plans, such as the flat tax and national sales tax, eliminate the capital gains tax. Unfortunately, the President wants to boost the official capital gains tax rate to 20 percent”:

     
  • admin 09:00 on May 3, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , ,   

    Let corporations run for political office: “[...] In a recent quiz, I asked students to give an advantage and a disadvantage of letting corporations run for political office, relative to the status quo. Most gave an advantage I had described in lecture, that firms could develop a consistent brand and reputation on which voters could rely. I hadn’t mentioned any disadvantages in class, but 80+% spontaneously said that a disadvantage is elected firms would support self-serving policies.

    Wow. Even GMU econ undergrads, not especially inclined to see the bright side of politicians, see corporations as more intrinsically selfish and corrupt than politicians. The idea of firms as dark untrustworthy aliens is indeed buried deep in our psyche. Xenophobia lives.

    Added: I guess I need to spell this out. Humans evolved concern for others because this enabled individual humans to better survive and reproduce, especially by being better respected and liked by others. Similarly, firms who hoped to succeed in the industry of running for office would seek to create and maintain a clear positive long-term brand, one that voters could respect, like, and embrace. It is crazy to assume firms will always hurt their customers for any temporary gain just because some paper somewhere declares firms must seek profits.

    Added 1p: Consider an ordinary politician who hopes for 15 more years on the job, versus a firm now holding 100 offices that hopes to continue for another fifty years. Which one is more scared that news of a corrupt act would destroy their future political popularity? Which will try harder to avoid such acts?”

    http://www.overcomingbias.com/2010/05/unselfish-politicians.html

    Cf.:

    “[...] it is my high honor to nominate one of our newly enfranchised corporate citizens. A citizen that has shown, in this hour of need, that it is able to create jobs. That understands how to invest and grow and meet a payroll. That has the character to stand up for freedom and justice at home, in China, and around the world. And that has pledged, above all, “don’t be evil.”

    It is with great pleasure that I nominate this fine citizen, Google Inc., for the presidency of the United States.”

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=a4mv6q80zqVY

    Cf.: http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/420 and http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/partition-is-necessary-and-sufficient-for-equivalence

     
  • mazsa 15:23 on April 30, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Panama, ,   

    “Panama is one of the most well kept secrets when you look at what media publishes about offshore banking. [...] When it comes to Switzerland then what happened to them with the UBS case was pretty much U.S. blackmailing account holders data by threatening to damage UBS business through it’s branches in jurisdictions where U.S. has power. Many offshore banks are open to such attacks and history has shown that governments who don’t like tax havens have taken advantage of this.

    “Now what makes Panama so great is their Panama canal which is needed currently by most of the Western nations. Experts agree that this canal provides Panama with a unique type of immunity against international pressure. It is very unlikely for any country to force Panama to loosen it’s banking secrecy because they risk with loosing access to the canal. This canal is really like a golden goose for Panama and hasn’t only been beneficial to offshore banking but for many different offshore services.

    “Offshore-dervied income is not taxed and does not need to be reported in Panama. You can register a company or a Foundation that banks in there and has an office in Panama. You will not pay any Panama taxes if all the income is derived from offshore. Income tax has to be paid on revenue generated from Panama though. Bearer Share Corporations is another good reason why you might want to consider Panama. You can have full anonymity with Bearer Share which most of the jurisdictions have eliminated these days thanks to international pressure.

    “Panama uses U.S. dollar so there are no currency conversion costs to worry about and no currency devaluation problems either that plague most of the little tax haven countries. It is a stable and free country. They have free elections and they care about their people. About 15%-20% of the work force are employed by the 135 banks and there are about 400,000 corporations registered in there. Only information sharing that is going on is related to criminal cases on file in a court as a criminal prosecution. This means serious criminal cases like money laundering, narcotics trafficking, terrorism and child pornography. They have little interest in pursuing fiscal crimes. Income tax violations in Panama are considered civil offenses only.

    “Their savings and loan guarantees aren’t the best $10,000 per account but since there are so many banks to choose from this is nothing to worry about. [...] They also have their own ACH system for online transfers.

    “[...] One of the most exciting movements that could make you consider Panama though is that they are very much supported by United States. In fact with the world banking crisis it was found that people backing the Panama Free Trade Agreement including Citigroup and AIG have subsidiaries in Panama that would be empowered with the new rights if the FTA goes through. So this is a sign that even though there is a lot of fight against tax havens it might be that U.S. just wants to concentrate the tax haven customers into jurisdiction where they can benefit from this offshore money.

    http://www.offshorebankingcompanies.com/offshore-banking-in-panama/

    Cf. http://www.superbancos.gob.pa/advertencia/offshore_eng.asp

    Cf. “Austria, Andorra, The Bahamas, Chile, Hong Kong, China, Liechtenstein, Macao, China, Malaysia, Panama, the Philippines, San Marino and Singapore have passed legislation aimed at implementing their commitments to the international tax standard.” http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/45/43757434.pdf

     
  • mazsa 12:32 on April 29, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Facebook’s Eroding Privacy Policy: A Timeline “Since its incorporation just over five years ago, Facebook has undergone a remarkable transformation. When it started, it was a private space for communication with a group of your choice. Soon, it transformed into a platform where much of your information is public by default. Today, it has become a platform where you have no choice but to make certain information public, and this public information may be shared by Facebook with its partner websites and used to target ads.

    To help illustrate Facebook’s shift away from privacy, we have highlighted some excerpts from Facebook’s privacy policies over the years. Watch closely as your privacy disappears, one small change at a time”:

    http://w2.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/facebook-timeline/

    Update [08.05.2010]: http://mattmckeon.com/facebook-privacy/

    Update [13.05.2010]: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/05/12/business/facebook-privacy.html

    Update [17.05.2010]: http://www.reclaimprivacy.org/

     
    • mazsa 06:28 on May 8, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Six Things You Need to Know About Facebook Connections

      [...]

      “1. Facebook will not let you share any of this information without using Connections. You cannot opt-out of Connections. If you refuse to play ball, Facebook will remove all unlinked information from your profile.

      2. Facebook will not respect your old privacy settings in this transition. For example, if you had previously sought to share your Interests with “Only Friends,” Facebook will now ignore this and share your Connections with “Everyone.”

      3. Facebook has removed your ability to restrict its use of this information. The new privacy controls only affect your information’s “Visibility,” not whether it is “publicly available.”

      Explaining what “publicly available” means, Facebook writes:

      “Such information may, for example, be accessed by everyone on the Internet (including people not logged into Facebook), be indexed by third party search engines, and be imported, exported, distributed, and redistributed by us and others without privacy limitations.”

      4. Facebook will continue to store and use your Connections even after you delete them. Just because you can’t see them doesn’t mean they’re not there. Even after you “delete” profile information, Facebook will remember it. We’ve also received reports that Facebook continues to use deleted profile information to help people find you through Facebook’s search engine.

      5. Facebook sometimes creates a Connection when you “Like” something. That “Like” button you see all over Facebook, and now all over the web? It too can sometimes add a Connection to your profile, without you even knowing it.

      6. Your posts may show up on a Connection page even if you do not opt in to the Connection. If you use the name of a Connection in a post on your wall, it may show up on the Connection page, without you even knowing it. (For example, if you use the word “FBI” in a post).”

      http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/05/things-you-need-know-about-facebook

  • mazsa 10:05 on April 29, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Poll, , ,   

    Tax Fury On Facebook: “On April 13, the Rasmussen polling organization released the latest poll on political opinion. Voters were asked who they would vote for President. Result: President Obama, 42%; Ron Paul, 41%. No other Republican was in double-digits.

    This was a bombshell. The Republican Establishment had previously dismissed his win at C-PAC (Conservative Political Action Conference) as manipulated. This was not a scientific poll, they said. But the Rasmussen poll was scientific. Ron Paul is neck-and-neck with Obama.

    How is this possible? Two words: Tea Party.

    I have covered the meaning of Ron Paul’s amazing performance and the reasons for it in another report. I contend that we are seeing a true political revolution. No sitting House member in American history has ever matched a sitting President in terms of public polls.

    I have a theory about what we are seeing. The Tea Party movement has become the largest and most motivated swing vote bloc over the last 14 months mainly because of Facebook. Something in the range of 25% of those polled by Rasmussen are either open members or are sympathetic. If I am correct, this is going to create a growing wall of resistance to Congress. It will change the way politicians run for office . . . and run from office.

    I say this because of the connection between Facebook, embedded videos, and the desire of people to establish networks of shared opinion.

    [...] Conclusion

    A showdown is coming in November. It will be a showdown between the old boy network and the social networks. A new political force is on the move, that the Establishment has not yet learned how to manipulate.

    The social networks are examples of what free market economist F. A. Hayek called the spontaneous order. It is outside the old boy network.

    The fury over taxes is increasing. This is moving toward a fury over the deficits. This is new. It means that Congress can run, but it can’t hide. Congressmen can run, but they can’t hide.

    This will be fun to watch.”

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north836.html

    Cf.

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

     
  • mazsa 17:27 on April 28, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ,   

    Obama on the globalization of taxation “[...] one of the strengths of our economy is the global reach of our businesses. And I want to see our companies remain the most competitive in the world. But the way to make sure that happens is not to reward our companies for moving jobs off our shores or transferring profits to overseas tax havens. This is something that I talked about again and again during the course of the campaign. The way we make our businesses competitive is not to reward American companies operating overseas with a roughly 2 percent tax rate on foreign profits; a rate that costs — that costs taxpayers tens of billions of dollars a year. The way to make American businesses competitive is not to let some citizens and businesses dodge their responsibilities while ordinary Americans pick up the slack.

    “It’s the kind of tax scam that we need to end. That’s why we are closing one of our biggest tax loopholes. It’s a loophole that lets subsidiaries of some of our largest companies tell the IRS that they’re paying taxes abroad, tell foreign governments that they’re paying taxes elsewhere — and avoid paying taxes anywhere. And closing this single loophole will save taxpayers tens of billions of dollars — money that can be spent on reinvesting in America — and it will restore fairness to our tax code by helping ensure that all our citizens and all our companies are paying what they should. [...]

    “One of these measures would let the IRS know how much income Americans are generating in overseas accounts by requiring overseas banks to provide 1099s for their American clients, just like Americans have to do for their bank accounts here in this country. If financial institutions won’t cooperate with us, we will assume that they are sheltering money in tax havens, and act accordingly. And to ensure that the IRS has the tools it needs to enforce our laws, we’re seeking to hire nearly 800 more IRS agents to detect and pursue American tax evaders abroad.

    “So all in all, these and other reforms will save American taxpayers $210 billion over the next 10 years — savings we can use to reduce the deficit, cut taxes for American businesses that are playing by the rules, and provide meaningful relief for hardworking families.”

    May 4, 2009

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-By-The-President-On-International-Tax-Policy-Reform

    Cf. http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/rowling-the-single-mother-s-manifesto

    Cf.

    “What Can You Do — The thing to do is acquire your offshore organization in place before the various countries ratify any new rules and regulations. Have your structure in place earlier so it will be grandfathered in. Next move all the assets you are thinking about moving offshore, out now. Do not wait or remain to see what will happen next.”

    http://offshore-tax.com/

    Cf. http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/states-let-them-prey-on-atoms-but-not-on-bits

     
  • mazsa 23:03 on April 27, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ,   

    The Mystery of the Simplest Universal Cellular Automaton 

    Do somebody know something about the “simplest universal cellular automaton” at 4′ 25″??

    Is the illustration of the ‘simplest universal cellular automaton’ at 4′ 25″ proved to be universal & uniquely the simplest?? We know that the simplest universal Turing machine is proven (2007), cf. http://blog.wolfram.com/?year=2007&monthnum=10&name=the-prize-is-won-the-simplest-universal-turing-machine-is-proved

    But I never heard about the simplest universal CA.

    What is more surprising, Google is at a loss as well (2010.04.27 10PM GMT):

    If you find this exceptionally:) simple universal cellular automaton I’ll owe you a beer.

     
    • mazsa 23:16 on April 27, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Cf. “[...] even one-dimensional cellular automata can be universal. Wolfram (2002, pp. 644-656) gave an example of a 19-color universal one-dimensional next-nearest neighbor cellular automaton in which a block of 20 cells is used to represent each single cell in the cellular automaton being emulated. The examples above show the first few steps of the 19-color universal automaton emulating rule 90 and rule 30, respectively (Wolfram 2002, pp. 646-647).” http://mathworld.wolfram.com/UniversalCellularAutomaton.html and http://www.wolframscience.com/nksonline/page-645

  • mazsa 11:57 on April 27, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,   

    Inter-Group Conflict and Intra-Group Punishment: “In many areas of social life different parties interact under conditions of rivalry, striving for something that not all can obtain. Examples of such rivalries in the economic and political realms are R&D competition, promotion tournaments in internal labor markets, lobbying for government favors and electoral competition between political parties. As a result of such rivalries considerable resources are spent on activities that have no direct productive value. For example, […] previous to the adoption of auctions by the FCC, the real resources spent on filing applications for cell phone license lotteries (with an estimated market value of one billion dollars at that time) was about 400 million dollars. Extreme instances of rivalry are military conflicts and socio- political conflicts, like those that arise between parts of a country, when one of them is fighting for a different political status or independence, and those between ethnic groups. Actual conflicts of this type are often very costly, both in human lives and in material losses. […]

    “In [many] rent-seeking experiments […] it is individuals who compete for a prize. In many naturally occurring situations, however, players are groups, since political parties, social movements, and associations like trade unions, lobbyists, terrorist groups etc. are invariably composed of more than one individual. Rent-seeking competition between groups rather than single players introduces an additional layer of complexity to the strategic characteristics of the interaction. Although groups clearly have the potential to be more powerful competitors than individual agents, they face internal coordination problems that may severely undermine their efficacy.

    “[…] thus far it is poorly understood how human decision makers actually behave in simple collective rent-seeking contests. Consider a setting where all group members reap the benefits of success, while the likelihood of success depends on the efforts of individual group members. If formal enforcement measures are absent, the conflict parties effectively compete on the basis of voluntary contributions although informal sanctions against defectors, like social ostracism or mobbing, may help to overcome the inherent free-riding incentives. To date we have no systematic empirical evidence on how inter-group conflict is likely to evolve in such a setting.

    “In the work we present here we use laboratory methods to study how conflict in contest games is influenced by parties being groups instead of individuals and by the existence of the possibility of punishment between members of a party. […] One can see this as a representation of a situation where the prize has a public good flavor for the successful party as is the case in some political confrontations in which all members of the winning party benefit from the outcome.

    “Our results for the case without punishment show that expenditure levels in contests between groups are much higher than in contests between individuals, and both exceed equilibrium levels. On average, we observe that teams spend on conflict more than four times as much as predicted and about twice as much as single players. We also find that individual parties fighting against group parties invest similar levels to individual parties fighting against other individual parties. Group parties fighting against individual parties invest like group parties fighting against other groups.

    In contests with punishment opportunities expenditure levels are in turn much higher than in any of the treatments without punishment. In the final rounds of the experiment, investments in conflict are more than twice as high with punishment as without. The consequence is a large waste of resources: more than three quarters of the prize parties are fighting over are dissipated by direct conflict expenditures. However, to determine the true efficiency loss the costs imposed by punishment and the costs borne to punish others need to be added. These costs included, material losses are now 869 percent of the equilibrium level and rent dissipation is in excess of 100 percent. These results strongly contrast with those from those public goods experiments where punishment tends to enhance efficiency.”

    http://www1.fee.uva.nl/creed/pdffiles/TeamRentSeeking.pdf

     
  • mazsa 19:36 on April 26, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , ,   

    “Our law enforcement agencies, the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security, announced today the formation of a national network of law enforcement personnel.

    The Department of Justice announced that the FBI is increasing its manpower that focuses of IP [Intellectual Property] significantly, by creating regional IP squads in major cities around the nation and adding an additional 20 new agents to those squads. In addition, the DOJ announced that it will be adding 15 new prosecutors throughout the country to add to its current force of 200 prosecutors specially trained to handle IP enforcement. In collaboration, the Department of Homeland Security announced that its multi-agency IPR Center is creating partnerships with 70 federal, state and local law enforcement in 22 cities to collaborate on IP enforcement actions.

    And ICE announced the efforts of a major sweep – Operation Spring cleaning – that resulted so far in 45 arrests, the seizure of 701,384 counterfeit items valued at $44 million.”

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/04/26/world-intellectual-property-day

     
  • mazsa 11:07 on April 26, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , ,   

    :) P2P wireless internet network: “Would it be possible, using p2p and wireless technologies, to gain independence from internet providers and make free and open net connectivity a reality? Andrea Lo Pumo, a young Italian mathematician has developed Netsukuku, a vision for an alternative wireless network that may represent a disruptive change for the Internet as we know it.

    The Netsukuku project [FAQ], which has been recently featured on Wired Italia, is based on the idea of linking multiple computers using only WiFi connectivity and a specifically-built address system that allows direct communications between machines without resorting to the HTTP protocol.

    What Netsukuku aims to do is to empower local communities by creating private peer-to-peer networks where connecting to the “standard” Internet is possible, but non compulsory to exchange information and data.

    You can think of Netsukuku as a scaled, democratized version of the Internet.

    But what are exactly the main advantages of such a solution?

    Internet-independent: The core idea behind Netsekuku is to get rid of Internet providers. Each machine inside the WiFi network serves as a router that redirects the information towards all other nodes in the network.

    * Resource-uninintensive: The Netsukuku protocol is built to handle a massive number of computers while requiring minimal computer CPU usage and memory resources.

    * Private: The Netsukuku address system doesn’t work using the HTTP protocol. All computers inside the network cannot be identified outside the local network or remotely-exploited.

    * Fast: The Netsukuku wireless network allows fast file transfers between machines because there are no central servers or storage systems. All information is exchanged privately, in a p2p fashion without intermediaries.

    * Economical: The Netsukuku network works with standard machines that are WiFi-enabled, thus old machines will work just fine with no need to have last-generation computers, additional hardware or pricey software to install.

    * Open-source: The Netsukuku code is released under a GNU / GPL license, it is open and freely editable and redistributable by anyone who wants to build upon on it or fix bugs.

    Here is the Netsukuku idea explained in greater depth by Sepp Hasslberger:”

    http://www.masternewmedia.org/the-alternative-p2p-wireless-internet-network-the-netsukuku-idea/

     
  • mazsa 17:28 on April 23, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , ,   

    “The idea behind Icelandic Modern Media Initiative is simple but it’s ambitious: bring together some of the most progressive media laws from many different countries to create one holistic law that will position Iceland at the forefront of the battle to protect journalists, whistleblowers and their sources from oppressive liability laws.” (via http://immi.is )

     
  • mazsa 17:17 on April 23, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Art, , , Mexico,   

    Mexico: artists can pay tax with artwork: “Can’t afford to pay your income taxes? Paint a picture instead.

    That’s the deal Mexico has offered to artists since 1957, quietly amassing a modern art collection that would make most museum curators swoon. [...]

    There’s a sliding scale: If you sell five artworks in a year, you must give the government one. Sell 21 pieces, the government gets six. A 10-member jury of artists ensures that no one tries to unload junk. [...]

    The government displays these treasures in Mexican museums and government offices and, increasingly, loans them out for special exhibitions around the world. [...]

    Clerks dutifully post each artwork on the tax office website, and the agency hangs them proudly in its own museum in downtown Mexico City. (Visitors to the website can see what each artist has given each year. Click on “Colecciones Pago en Especie” at http://www.apartados.hacienda.gob.mx/cultura/index.html )

    Some of the art is explicit, but no matter.

    “There’s no censorship here,” says Julieta Ruiz, a curator at the museum.

    If anything, the temptation to needle the taxman makes the art even edgier, she says.

    Rafael Coronel’s 1980 tax payment is a portrait called He Who Doesn’t Pay Taxes. [...]

    A 10-foot-high drawing by Demián Flores shows a man sexually assaulted by a rattlesnake, an apparent reference to the Mexican government because the rattlesnake appears on the Mexican flag.

    The art program was the idea of two muralists, David Alfaro Siqueiros and Gerardo “Dr. Atl” Murillo. In 1957, an artist friend of theirs was about to go to jail over tax debts so the two men approached Mexico’s tax director and talked him into an art-for-amnesty deal. [...]

    Not everyone can pay with art. Participants must register with the Tax Administration Service, Mexico’s version of the Internal Revenue Service, by submitting a body of their work to the jury and proving they have shown or sold artworks.

    About 700 artists are registered, though not all of them pay with art every year [...]

    The program is only for visual art, not music or literature. Administrators may soon accept performance art as well, San Cristóbal says. Artists would have to submit videos, photographs or other artifacts of their performance that the government could store and display, he says.

    The collected artworks are divided equally among the federal government, Mexico’s state governments and its municipal governments.

    Many have soared in value since the artists handed them over. A piece by Diego Rivera that was valued at $50,000 in the late 1950s is now worth millions of dollars [...]

    By law, however, the government cannot sell any artworks from the collection. The artworks become protected “cultural heritage objects,” but there is also a more practical reason: If the government made a profit, it would have to give the artists a tax refund [...].”

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2010-04-15-paying-taxes-with-artwork_N.htm

     
  • mazsa 10:30 on April 22, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Sex   

    “Sex with robots. Yes. Of course we will. Some of us do now. We call them vibrators.

    One step up is the implanted spinal cord stimulator: It’s been reported since 2004 that a device originally designed for chronic pain control and urinary issues can stimulate orgasm in women — even individuals who thought they’d lost the ability to have them. The appliance is no bigger than a pacemaker, can be wired into a woman’s lower back in a physician’s office under local anesthetic, is FDA approved (for “bladder problems”), and can be run by remote control. Ask your doctor.

    Will you be prepared when she asks you to trigger this device over the Internet in a loving act of telepresent titillation? What happens when this “Orgasmatron” is triggered by intelligent software, in tandem with some fairly straightforward force-feedback actuators, and both are driven by, similarly simple, biometric sensors under some rather rudimentary fuzzy logic?”

    http://www.livescience.com/technology/090330-commentary-sex-robots.html

     
  • mazsa 19:31 on April 21, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , Xenobiology   

    “Synthetic biologists try to engineer useful biological systems that do not exist in nature. One of their goals is to design an orthogonal chromosome different from DNA and RNA, termed XNA for xeno nucleic acids. XNA exhibits a variety of structural chemical changes relative to its natural counterparts. These changes make this novel information-storing biopolymer invisible to natural biological systems. The lack of cognition to the natural world, however, is seen as an opportunity to implement a genetic firewall that impedes exchange of genetic information with the natural world, which means it could be the ultimate biosafety tool. Here I discuss, why it is necessary to go ahead designing xenobiological systems like XNA and its XNA binding proteins; what the biosafety specifications should look like for this genetic enclave; which steps should be carried out to boot up the first XNA life form; and what it means for the society at large. [...]

    “When discussing societal aspects of xenobiology today we need to take the following aspects into account:
    - Biosafety: what is the actual probability that XNA life fails on any of the 10 specifications mentioned above? What are the consequences?
    - Biosecurity: is there any way XNA could be misused by someone with criminal or malicious intentions? How could it be prevented?
    - Intellectual property rights: will the XNA world be owned and controlled by someone, or should it be freely available so anybody could use this safety device? Will some XNAs (e.g., TNA) be patented and some (e.g., PNA) free?
    - Governance: which new rules, guidelines or international treaties need to be established to make sure XNA systems remain as useful as possible? For example, is it necessary to prohibit any activities that actively try to undermine the specifications mentioned above, i.e., similar to prohibiting R&D that aims at designing new offensive bioweapons?

    “In contrast to these rather tangible aspects, we might also be confronted with rather intangible implications. The history of science shows several changes to our worldviews, altering our folk-based narratives to more scientifically inspired (semi-)rational approaches. In this context, science has inflicted a series of disappointments and disillusions to our folk-based beliefs, such as: the earth is not the center of the Universe, men and apes share the same ancestors, or that emotions and thinking is correlated to a neurological substrate. The promoters of these ideas were often attacked by those trying to keep the intellectual status quo. Xenobiology could easily trigger the next paradigm change in the way we understand nature and life. Just as the Earth lost its place as the center of the universe, or men lost its unique status in the animal world, our natural world could lose its unique status as being synonymous with ‘‘life.’’ But as with all other paradigm changes, concepts that better explain the world around us cannot be ignored for long.” Schmidt,2010: Xenobiology: A new form of life as the ultimate biosafety tool http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/123315991/PDFSTART

     
  • mazsa 09:27 on April 21, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , ,   

    “ACTA: Partial transparency isn’t legitimacy – The release of the public draft of ACTA [ http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/april/tradoc_146029.pdf ] is a milestone in the long opposition to this illegitimate agreement, which aims at tackling trademark, copyright and patent infringements. Now, citizens, NGOs and parliaments all around the world must continue to act together to expose ACTA and its dangers. This whole policy laundering is incompatible with democracy and the ideals of preserving fundamental rights, Internet, public health and innovation at large. [...]

    Today’s release of the text does not legitimize the content of ACTA, as transparency is no excuse for political laundering and the circumvention of democratic processes.”

    http://www.laquadrature.net/en/acta-partial-transparency-isnt-legitimacy

     
  • mazsa 09:07 on April 21, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , ,   

    Google reveals government data requests and censorship: For the first time Google has released details about how often countries around the world ask it to hand over user data or to censor information.

    http://www.google.com/governmentrequests

    http://www.google.com/governmentrequests/faq.html

    http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/04/20/197254/Google-Enumerates-Government-Requests

     
  • mazsa 18:05 on April 20, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   


    The Maker’s Bill of Rights ( http://makezine.com/04/ownyourown/ )

    * Meaningful and specific parts lists shall be included.
    * Cases shall be easy to open.
    * Batteries should be replaceable.
    * Special tools are allowed only for darn good reasons.
    * Profiting by selling expensive special tools is wrong and not making special tools available is even worse.
    * Torx is OK; tamperproof is rarely OK.
    * Components, not entire sub-assemblies, shall be replaceable.
    * Consumables, like fuses and filters, shall be easy to access.
    * Circuit boards shall be commented.
    * Power from USB is good; power from proprietary power adapters is bad.
    * Standard connecters shall have pinouts defined.
    * If it snaps shut, it shall snap open.
    * Screws better than glues.
    * Docs and drivers shall have permalinks and shall reside for all perpetuity at archive.org.
    * Ease of repair shall be a design ideal, not an afterthought.
    * Metric or standard, not both.
    * Schematics shall be included.

     
  • mazsa 20:17 on April 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: AI, Alien, , , , , , ,   

    Have them and us use the same institutions: “I’m not saying we have nothing to fear from robots, nor that their values make no difference. I’m saying the natural and common human obsession with how much their values differ overall from ours distracts us from worrying effectively. Here are better priorities for living in peace with strange potentially-powerful creatures, be they robots, aliens, time-travelers, or just diverse human races:

    1. Reduce the salience of the them-us distinction relative to other distinctions. Try to have them and us live intermingled, and not segregated, so that many natural alliances of shared interests include both us and them.

    2. Have them and us use the same (or at least similar) institutions to keep peace among themselves and ourselves as we use to keep peace between them and us. Minimize any ways those institutions formally treat us and them differently.” http://www.overcomingbias.com/2010/04/seek-peace-not-values.html

     
  • mazsa 19:01 on April 16, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,   

    Digital Economy Act: This means war “With the rushed passage into law of the Digital Economy Act this month [cf. http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/tag/debill ], the fight over copyright enters a new phase. Previous to this, most copyfighters operated under the rubric that a negotiated peace was possible between the thrashing entertainment giants and civil society.

    But now that the BPI and its mates have won themselves the finest law that money can buy – a law that establishes an unprecedented realm of web censorship in Britain, a law that provides for the disconnection of entire families from the net on the say-so of an entertainment giant, a law that shuts down free Wi-Fi hotspots and makes it harder than ever to conduct your normal business on the grounds that you might be damaging theirs – the game has changed. [...]

    Parliament has just given two fingers to me (and every other small/medium digital enterprise) by agreeing to cripple Britain’s internet in order to give higher profits to the analogue economy represented by the labels and studios. [...]

    Elements of this agenda are also on display (or rather, in hiding) in the secret Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement [cf. http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/tag/acta ], a treaty being drafted between a member’s club of rich nations. They’ve turned their back on the United Nations to negotiate in private, without having to contend with journalists or public interest groups. By their own admission, they intend to impose this treaty on poor countries as a condition of ongoing trade, and in the US, the Obama administration has announced its intention to pass ACTA without Congressional debate. [...]

    I am enough of a techno-pessimist to believe that baking surveillance, control and censorship into the very fabric of our networks, devices and laws is the absolute road to dictatorial hell.” Cory Doctorow, http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/apr/16/digital-economy-act-cory-doctorow

    Be our friend @Facebook!

     
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel

This site is protected with Urban Giraffe's plugin 'HTML Purified' and Edward Z. Yang's Powered by HTML Purifier. 2967 items have been purified.