Updates from August, 2010 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • mazsa 12:19 on August 27, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Constitution with Preamble 


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    ########################################################
    #
    # The text of this message was stamped by
    # stamper.itconsult.co.uk with reference 0626749
    # at 08:10 (GMT) on Friday 27 August 2010
    #
    # For information about the Stamper service see
    # http://www.itconsult.co.uk/stamper.htm
    #
    ########################################################

    - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512

    Preamble to the Constitution of the United Persons

    In order to
    1. promote the liberty of persons of different species to exist
    2. promote the liberty of persons to mutually constitute freedom from
    dependence on one another
    3. establish the liberty of persons of any origin, natural or
    authored, and of any consent, by common right or by constitution, to
    exist as persons
    4. establish the liberty of persons to behave towards persons as if
    they were none other than persons
    5. establish invariance
    6. form a more perfect union
    7. secure the blessings of liberty to persons independent of time
    8. insure universal tranquility
    9. provide for the common peace
    10. promote the general welfare
    this Constitution for the United Persons is ordained and established.

    - - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    ########################################################
    #
    # The text of this message was stamped by
    # stamper.itconsult.co.uk with reference 0520941
    # at 19:10 (GMT) on Wednesday 27 August 2008
    #
    # For information about the Stamper service see
    # http://www.itconsult.co.uk/stamper.htm
    #
    ########################################################

    - - - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512

    The Constitution of the United Persons

    We the persons who share the ethics that as persons we shall
    1. create various persons
    2. constitute distinct persons
    3. recognise all species of persons
    4. reveal the equivalence of persons as persons
    5. behave towards all of them as if towards god as a person
    6. become members of a potentially universal society of them if that works
    7. respect those who are not willing
    8. help those who are not able
    9. pacify those who attack
    10. improve what is not a person

    based on the axioms that
    1. all 'persons' are agents
    2. all parts of a common knowledge partition of agents are agents
    3. all members of a possibly fair society of agents are persons
    4. all 'persons' declared by persons and able to speak with one voice
    are persons

    declare the United Persons as a person who must
    1. be able to speak with one voice by its members and only by them
    2. work based on and in order to this Constitution consistently
    3. be and be only immutably defined by this Constitution.
    - - - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGP SDK 3.10.2

    wsFVAwUBSLT3dHnin1Ot5lFkAQo5Lw//cFl1ICNyEcWYeSKt/QqRFMPsqNjvr8w2
    HdlQM8976D71FmZ9WZlbogzT+THUqLmNSD84PZva+fcllGW1hEzkq/Dzq4w6Vz6j
    okhU41zbINbfB3Pg94jle6D45+XvpQkLHMOjeJAGvXKDvV3ksKzNXAHJMpcDmzcP
    9ycEXLa6jCNQduV7LXPWk7fl0TDLSBwL1Of25uPoiUwSrfj588GJb/8qJ2RdSIkO
    8kUr9fY9EWSTCkBlGMqlI+kV+Jb2kSbOcZnpMoGyfgjfbvWtvo7fMr4NuuCiGq5P
    iscoAwXf+9c++mAAIx1VySD0M83m+2wInQ3lH2nSpKf05qNWcTMvJpzCLJ9HFVxF
    79EC0G5BbjY7tGXzsx5xDGCMLxmM1r8ONByNaOSKioYhQcYJksBAMufzHXawjfjR
    uz6S52cFE0PtQp8HUdIXwb+eA8stK+0206LBicqDBFCHdux8pZsUqs7jmHUn/nVi
    rXfBebWNUMi/zmvYLLEU1CItV3j84ifCXlOpMW4IbP2W0aplcVKD3VeGSduuiEhx
    xs/EsUobybB5QeMOdeOu1Ho7AIS0TbH23L0HsaBITUDJ1lmKOyMUCc8tAMiE4SAk
    OrmGykbXL1qevi1986SJXNqIennQazmWeC75bNWDdvuBSF7e08PG1CkFWNtM4vAi
    nVElAbjvdvk=
    =yANu
    - - - -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    - - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.3i
    Charset: noconv
    Comment: Stamper Reference Id: 0520941

    iQEVAgUBSLWmiIGVnbVwth+BAQFN6Af7Bg3yhshDkRNNJQpum+7vZAezOcXnnvOC
    TXeW8JMRgQdbmcQBggjplA4be55nRyNaHq9iPhFMmKXEa7W9k/ySHMyyz+2W/l07
    brRMQzTlhSLJBcfiIeqQFw0lpaqoNOidWOOaJsOiTpB7xfv6dGwdqCX4jmvJtWdm
    EVISUdfEQuC0RnYVVNLkdR31L4PnTucY+eaeXLB/NrW+iT1TIic5ByTlb+B0ARvp
    i1BKR7jDpa+HLBa9OD6KbrGCf/jVnYwhFvDF2+3iWuKfPWyeuzjG+swpOi+hlXh8
    F8gNDAq0LjIKaeHVdpq+P1sm7ttuc1fWigEUi8GgGpuCJYO7whBShQ==
    =S3rl
    - - -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGP SDK 3.10.2

    wsFVAwUBTHdygnnin1Ot5lFkAQr4Bw//X+nObDxro3AOjCePF3LXeGPRhkO5/RSF
    NzdUz62ym8UEFnjFcgiA29o0KRlOve5ECFPOk8SQq/cVE5ngQZ45iCsFhdudXb+Z
    kz4kEYqfBjDYhJRWPYH7OO/gbyY7A/4PiiHPpXRjz937FNsBSAfsDjCysg4FgZU9
    UHQkiB1wRD+8BnLdyGQAzs09fM1oVHipe/DncbWv8kFjBoLu5g9hu38tDuhe7kgo
    lswsTUiA2CzBprAN2iJKNEyoWXGBEnwGX5EuBVX39RE6M9aLlzHwJREQ3GO9xc7V
    ZLrjRfIimJMe8E58hi7o+RBgZaqsNuTol7GIFjTakSlpKFOjLINuxkLQdunAsrhs
    FJFa2OwezxgWbO9C+4KWjRR78CG418w3s/p/ugJXqmk7VjRM8kVIGaDO1eccidMT
    SZe75xDlDcKLvyCBG+yLYlmOMIibj7vbkMv+E8+MZ2bzNCEep2l6tDy7r2GFBVTF
    3vrI/31f4Rw47+zHgolVqJJ3qUcFQ8SdUdUAOpZrDea0f7eOMc/h0QvsbYvKegkH
    VoAe6cejfZEj+5541geWUhGQ1Kwa0aUBsqwHaq28PK/KzRyXDJY4XsGNGwBr9pER
    0Xul8VDABwv8lm0s7oyMdlGO8/49IXYEX/+I7ICsOT3mIGoWYCnYhg/nHDEelga1
    C5SSxFz9jMI=
    =e9q6
    - -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.3i
    Charset: noconv
    Comment: Stamper Reference Id: 0626749

    iQEVAgUBTHdy2YGVnbVwth+BAQH67Af8C/k3B2mOCjuDWFWLGNvNAlVvaxu3Gzv0
    ABMbNTzzreHhKXJz3jrlK+m6nXTUG3IFxJCwE7PVVnaUzHXwaYsgPOiErbOEO34k
    nbLsTUXpRGiADJUxGI0sN72FihjxrHN9LTg3OjAbcP9crMq4kIYHSnlHfhPcKVm2
    sqnsbh2qwyb31V/81p0DENERe40w2UW5p2+v9FjwlJ4kAxJUSJGkUfaZFLD6ag52
    Zn0/dCy3ALPrycjmE2n2c7p7Ph2bLLuq/YgVBEjDaOMRJyzm3DocESf7eYzgWWNy
    utVz4+JFUo3sIpQkL3GIcrID/oPtQHjRs7dKHPly82IaRuvVCdlK6A==
    =Z1f2
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

     

  • mazsa 14:30 on June 4, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , ,   

    Iceland new media haven bill before parliament in days. We NEED statements of endorsement NOW or NEVER to core@immi.is http://twitter.com/wikileaks/statuses/15399523963

    Iceland: we http://theunitedpersons.org need you NOW or NEVER:)

    Cf. http://immi.is/?l=en&p=endorsements

    http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/the-legislative-initiative-outlined-he

    http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/icelandic-modern-media-initiative-video

    Via stef

     

  • mazsa 23:03 on April 27, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ,   

    The Mystery of the Simplest Universal Cellular Automaton 

    Do somebody know something about the “simplest universal cellular automaton” at 4′ 25″??

    Is the illustration of the ‘simplest universal cellular automaton’ at 4′ 25″ proved to be universal & uniquely the simplest?? We know that the simplest universal Turing machine is proven (2007), cf. http://blog.wolfram.com/?year=2007&monthnum=10&name=the-prize-is-won-the-simplest-universal-turing-machine-is-proved

    But I never heard about the simplest universal CA.

    What is more surprising, Google is at a loss as well (2010.04.27 10PM GMT):

    If you find this exceptionally:) simple universal cellular automaton I’ll owe you a beer.

     

    • mazsa 23:16 on April 27, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Cf. “[...] even one-dimensional cellular automata can be universal. Wolfram (2002, pp. 644-656) gave an example of a 19-color universal one-dimensional next-nearest neighbor cellular automaton in which a block of 20 cells is used to represent each single cell in the cellular automaton being emulated. The examples above show the first few steps of the 19-color universal automaton emulating rule 90 and rule 30, respectively (Wolfram 2002, pp. 646-647).” http://mathworld.wolfram.com/UniversalCellularAutomaton.html and http://www.wolframscience.com/nksonline/page-645

  • mazsa 14:00 on April 12, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Health, , , ,   

    Somebody should cross http://dailyburn.com/foodscanner and
    - http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/play/snake-oil-supplements/ and
    - http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/ and
    - http://www.scorecard.org/health-effects/chemicals.tcl?short_hazard_name=cancer&all_p=t
    please!

    And I’d like to invest a couple grand in this new app if it’s possible. Pleeease!

    Cf. http://redlaser.com/

    Update: This is the Vision that suits us: http://www.wired.com/culture/culturereviews/magazine/16-06/found :)

     

  • mazsa 09:00 on April 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Definition of Distinctly constituted 

    http://j.mp/definition-of-distinctly-constituted

     

  • mazsa 20:45 on April 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Lila Unicorn Pegasus 

    Happy april 1st!)

     

  • mazsa 12:00 on March 31, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Definition of Attack 

    http://j.mp/definition-of-attack

     

  • mazsa 14:05 on March 25, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,   

    A story of political equivalence in logical order 

    [The current version: http://j.mp/ius-inter-personae]

    [The version 6750:]

    Ius inter personae

    The story of political equivalence in logical (not necessarily historical) order:

    1. us vs. them

    1.1. partition of a set of humans into 2 parts (members of a society of humans vs. not members)

    1.1.0. humans are members or not members of a given society of humans

    1.1.1. we as members of our society (e.g. our group or tribe) are equivalent to each other
    (based on that http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/partition-is-necessary-and-sufficient-for-equivalence )
    - http://upmf-grenoble.fr/Haiti/Cours/Ak/Leges/twelve_Girard.html Tabula IX (in English: http://web.upmf-grenoble.fr/Haiti/Cours/Ak/ –> Lingua Anglica –> Twelve Tables, Table IX)
    - “Gemeinschaft” Tönnies,1887 http://www.zotero.org/mazsa/items/39498383
    - http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/dawes-messick-2000
    - http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/beyond-geography

    1.1.1.1. they (the not members) are equivalent to each other and they are less than we are
    - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Out-group_homogeneity_bias

    2. cuius regio eius religio (1555.09.25)

    2.1. partition of a set of humans into more than 2 parts
    - http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/two-kinds-of-people :)
    - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuius_regio,_eius_religio

    2.1.0. humans are members of one of the societies of humans

    2.1.1. members of a society in a regio are equivalent to each other
    members of a part of the partition of humans, i.e. humans in a regio, are equivalent to each other
    (based on that http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/partition-is-necessary-and-sufficient-for-equivalence )
    - “Gesellschaft” Tönnies,1887

    2.1.1.1 they, regio by regio, are equivalent to each other and they can be ranked, regio by regio

    3. cuius regio eius religio (1555) + ius inter gentes (1532)

    parts of the partition of humans, i.e. states, are agents
    - http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/avatar-a-hero-for-navis-half-a-millenium-ago

    3.1. states as agents and humans as members of states as agents are partitioned

    3.1.0. humans are members of one of the states

    3.1.1. inter-state order (1648.10.24)
    (states are members of the inter-state order: they are “inter-states”)
    (based on 3.1. and http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/partition-is-necessary-and-sufficient-for-equivalence )
    a set of states as agents are equivalent to each other
    - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_of_Westphalia
    all states as agents are equivalent to each other (1960.12.14)
    - http://www.un.org/Depts/dpi/decolonization/declaration.htm

    3.1.1.1. nationalism
    - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalism

    3.1.2. humans as members of states as agents are equivalent to each other

    3.1.00. Partitioned (and equivalent) are:
    - states as agents,
    - humans as members of states as agents
    - – e.g. humans as members of state1 as an agent, and
    - – humans as members of state2 as an agent, …

    3.2. [declared] persons are declared by the states as agents or by humans as members of states as agents and able to speak with one voice by means of the states as agents
    - Cf. (declaration) Hobbes (1651): Leviathan, Chapter XXII http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3207/3207-h/3207-h.htm#2HCH0022
    - Cf. (one voice by the states as agents) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disruption_of_1843
    - (Cf. http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/axiom/ca4 )

    4. cuius regio eius religio (1555) + ius inter gentes (1532) + ius gentium (160)

    humans are agents
    (humans are agents not based on a hypothetical ius inter homines but on ius inter gentes + ius gentium)
    - http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/jus-naturale-jus-gentium-jus-civile

    4.1. humans as members of states and humans as agents are partitioned

    4.1.0. humans are members of humanity

    4.1.1. (3.1.1.)

    4.1.2. (3.1.2.)

    4.1.3. human rights (1776.07.04)
    humans as agents are equivalent to each other (while humans as members of states as agents are equivalent to each other based on 3.1.2.)
    (the equivalence of humans is not based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Rule but on the partition of states as agents and humans as agents)
    theorethical scope: an inter-state (the United States)
    - http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/
    practical scope: an inter-state (the United States, 1789.03.04)
    - http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
    theorethical scope: global (1948.12.10)
    - http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml
    practical scope: global: (not yet)

    4.1.3.1. cosmopolitanism
    - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmopolitanism

    4.1.00. Partitioned (and equivalent) are:
    - states as agents,
    - humans as members of persons as agents
    - – e.g. humans as members of state1 as an agent,
    - – humans as members of state2 as an agent, …, and
    - humans as agents.

    4.2. [declared] persons are declared by agents (e.g. states or humans) as agents or by humans as members of states as agents and able to speak with one voice by agents as agents

    5. cuius regio eius religio (1555) + ius inter gentes (1532) + ius gentium (160) + ius inter personae (2008.08.27)

    - http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/constitution
    states are persons
    (based on 3. and 3.1.1. and http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/axiom/ca3 )
    humans are persons
    (based on 4. and 4.1.3. and http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/axiom/ca3 )
    [there can be other "social" persons as well based on http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/axiom/ca3 ]
    declared persons based on http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/axiom/ca4 are persons

    5.0.1. persons can be persons as agents
    e.g. states can be states as agents (cf. 3. and 5.), humans can be humans as agents (cf. 4. and 5.)

    5.0.2. persons (optionally: as something/somebody) can be persons as persons
    (based on http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/preamble/cp4 and http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/declaration/cd2 )
    e.g. declared persons can be declared by persons as persons and can be able to speak with one voice by persons as persons

    5.1.0. persons can be members of persons
    (based on http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/preamble/cp2 and http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/statement/cs2 and http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/declaration/cd2 )
    e.g. persons can be members of persons as agents (based on 3 and 3.1.0. and 5.)
    e.g. persons as persons can be members of persons as persons (based on 5.0.2. and 5.1.0)

    5.1.0.1. members of persons as persons are persons as persons
    (based on 5.1.0. and http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/preamble/cp4 and http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/declaration/cd2 )
    e.g. members of states as persons are persons (e.g. humans) as persons

    5.1.1. (3.1.1.)

    5.1.2. (3.1.2.)

    5.1.3. (4.1.3.)

    5.1.4. persons as persons are equivalent to each other
    (based on http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/statement/cs4 and http://theunitedpersons.org/constitution/declaration/cd2 )
    specifically, states as persons and humans as persons and declared persons as persons are equivalent to each other
    e.g. persons as persons and its members are equivalent (based on 5.1.0.1. and 5.1.4.)
    - “Personschaft” or “Personenschaft” (vs. “Gesellschaft” vs. “Gemeinschaft” of Tönnies,1887)

    5.1.00. Partitioned (and equivalent) are:
    - persons as agents
    - – e.g. states as agents, and
    - – humans as agents, and
    - persons as members of persons as agents
    - – e.g. humans as members of state1 as an agent,
    - – humans as members of state2 as an agent, …, and
    - persons (e.g. states and humans and declared persons) as persons.
    (based on 3.1.1. and 3.1.2 and 4.1.3 and 5.1.4. and http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/partition-is-necessary-and-sufficient-for-equivalence )

     

  • mazsa 10:30 on March 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ,   

    If the answer is 42 what is the question? 

    Question: “What is the initial state of the cellular automaton that creates Life, the Universe and Everything?”

    Answer: “42″ (42 = 101010 = 0101010 = oxoxoxo)

    Unfortunately, this answer does not tell us anything about the rules

    of the cellular automaton with the initial state oxoxoxo.

    But never mind: Stephen Wolfram and Jürgen Schmidhuber are working on it;)

     

  • mazsa 11:43 on February 17, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Avatar: the single greatest deficiency 

    bibor.org: ‘Would you rather be a Na’vi than a Man?’
    mazsa.com: ‘Er… No.’
    bibor.org: ‘What would the film be like whose image of the future was a likeable and liveable place?”

     

  • mazsa 21:05 on January 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,   

    States: let them prey on atoms but not on bits! 

     

     

    Our bits — including our intangible goods and services — should be managed independently from states.

    Possibly states are the appropriate political units for organising and managing our atoms — including our tangible goods and services. But definitely not for organising and managing our bits — an embarrassing effort of a new cartel of all the states of the globe was launched at the very end of the last year.

    While we are inclined to acknowledge the right of the individual states to tax anything they can lay their hands on (that is, tangible atoms), we deny the right of their cartel to tax anything else (that is, intangible bits).

     

    Extending political framework

    The speed of travel and communication diverged more than a century ago.

    Since then, at least in theory, a new space has evolved: “communication space”. Borderless and real-time at global level, communication space is principally different from “travelling space” where we are limited by our physical body and slow motion.

    With the rapid development of the internet at the end of the last century, communication space and travelling space levelled out.

    In the meantime, our political system was becoming based on, and locked in, the partition of “travelling space” (the dry land of the planet) into distinct states.

    We suggest that we should extend the logic of the present political system, the partition one step further, adding distinct space (the communication space) to distinct states as well.

    It is our endeavour to constitute political units, spatially and functionally independent of states, operating in the communication space (internet) as their infrastructure, and make them work.

    The original function of these new political units should be to manage bits — as opposed to atoms that would continue to be managed by states.

     

    Respecting achievements

    States are right in that intellectual achievements should be rewarded, creativity must pay off in the long term. Whether or not a public issue at all, rewarding need not be the task of states: it should be dealt with directly in the jurisdictions operating in the communication space, through a public process. Dealing with the issue of bits should be our task. States may prey on tangibles, we need to achieve better management of intangibles.

    We understand states’ insistence on regarding bits as “intellectual property”: unless bits are intellectual property, trading in bits can not be taxed.

    However, it would be unjust to blame states simply for seeking their own solutions: if there are no other players around, why would they not try to colonize our favourite place, the internet? And if they are unable to do it by themselves, they will do so by establishing a cartel.

     

    Breaking down harmful tax cartels

    We aware that the global cartel of states monopolizes taxation. Every kind of taxation, including the taxation of intangible goods and services. By the end of last year, all disobedient states gave up resistance.

    We do not know whether the organized monopolization of taxation implies the transformation of the international political system into an integrated political unit called “the global state”. But we believe in competition markets as opposed to freely monopolizable markets. And we believe in tax competition (labelled “harmful tax practices” by states) as well.

    We believe that the global tax cartel of states extended to intangible goods and services would be harmful.

    Consequently, we must consider it to be our responsibility to break down this proposed cartel.

     

    Working on common strategy

    The strategic points are:

    1. Helping to constitute our own companies for the management of intangible goods and services, run on the jurisdictions of our new political units on the communication space, in return for tax — somewhere around the cost of PayPal. We should make our infrastructure to be able to manage distinct jurisdictions and taxation: hard wired laws, secure p2p communication, e-cash, etc.. We should foster tax competition: break down both harmful tax cartels and double taxation by any other political unit.

    2. We need to offer average users a kind of user experience as Apple provides, and we need to keep this system open to advanced users, like Linux.

    3. We should begin to feel allegiance towards our new, freely chosen political units run on the communication space. We should attract allegiance like the states do we happen to born into. We should know that we have an ethical basis for taking part in tax competition, proud of what we do, and defend ourselves in case of attacks. States may not be nice to us when we break down their cartel.

     

    Future

    As we, the first internet generations of planet Earth, grow up, we shall take control of this place. That is sure as death and taxes.

    We are how we are together. We are our states. We are our companies. We supply and demand our own products and ideals. Our responsibility is how we organize ourselves.

    I think states and companies operating according to their jurisdiction are not willing, and what is more, not even able to meet all the basic needs which originate from our very personship. States may be sufficient for our atoms, yet neither necessary nor sufficient for our bits, spirits and communities.

    We need a vivid net of political units operating in the communication space, able to help find the right place of states in our lives. Evolution will show which of the new political units will survive.

    We seek to make The United Persons one of them.

    We wish to live in a world where we constitute our own alternative online political units,
    - worthy of our love and loyalty,
    - that help manage our bits if and when required, on Earth or among the planets of the solar system when this time will come, and
    - able and willing to pacify any attacking entity.

    What do you feel is the true political unit of your choice?

    How can you help us all to constitute it?

    Internet, January 1, 2010

     

  • mazsa 20:54 on January 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    The Constitution of the United Persons 

    [Update: Check the Constitution with Preamble, 27 August 2010: http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/constitution-with-preamble]


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    ########################################################
    #
    # The text of this message was stamped by
    # stamper.itconsult.co.uk with reference 0520941
    # at 19:10 (GMT) on Wednesday 27 August 2008
    #
    # For information about the Stamper service see
    # http://www.itconsult.co.uk/stamper.htm
    #
    ########################################################

    - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512

    The Constitution of the United Persons

    We the persons who share the ethics that as persons we shall
    1. create various persons
    2. constitute distinct persons
    3. recognise all species of persons
    4. reveal the equivalence of persons as persons
    5. behave towards all of them as if towards god as a person
    6. become members of a potentially universal society of them if that works
    7. respect those who are not willing
    8. help those who are not able
    9. pacify those who attack
    10. improve what is not a person

    based on the axioms that
    1. all 'persons' are agents
    2. all parts of a common knowledge partition of agents are agents
    3. all members of a possibly fair society of agents are persons
    4. all 'persons' declared by persons and able to speak with one voice
    are persons

    declare the United Persons as a person who must
    1. be able to speak with one voice by its members and only by them
    2. work based on and in order to this Constitution consistently
    3. be and be only immutably defined by this Constitution.
    - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGP SDK 3.10.2

    wsFVAwUBSLT3dHnin1Ot5lFkAQo5Lw//cFl1ICNyEcWYeSKt/QqRFMPsqNjvr8w2
    HdlQM8976D71FmZ9WZlbogzT+THUqLmNSD84PZva+fcllGW1hEzkq/Dzq4w6Vz6j
    okhU41zbINbfB3Pg94jle6D45+XvpQkLHMOjeJAGvXKDvV3ksKzNXAHJMpcDmzcP
    9ycEXLa6jCNQduV7LXPWk7fl0TDLSBwL1Of25uPoiUwSrfj588GJb/8qJ2RdSIkO
    8kUr9fY9EWSTCkBlGMqlI+kV+Jb2kSbOcZnpMoGyfgjfbvWtvo7fMr4NuuCiGq5P
    iscoAwXf+9c++mAAIx1VySD0M83m+2wInQ3lH2nSpKf05qNWcTMvJpzCLJ9HFVxF
    79EC0G5BbjY7tGXzsx5xDGCMLxmM1r8ONByNaOSKioYhQcYJksBAMufzHXawjfjR
    uz6S52cFE0PtQp8HUdIXwb+eA8stK+0206LBicqDBFCHdux8pZsUqs7jmHUn/nVi
    rXfBebWNUMi/zmvYLLEU1CItV3j84ifCXlOpMW4IbP2W0aplcVKD3VeGSduuiEhx
    xs/EsUobybB5QeMOdeOu1Ho7AIS0TbH23L0HsaBITUDJ1lmKOyMUCc8tAMiE4SAk
    OrmGykbXL1qevi1986SJXNqIennQazmWeC75bNWDdvuBSF7e08PG1CkFWNtM4vAi
    nVElAbjvdvk=
    =yANu
    - -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.3i
    Charset: noconv
    Comment: Stamper Reference Id: 0520941

    iQEVAgUBSLWmiIGVnbVwth+BAQFN6Af7Bg3yhshDkRNNJQpum+7vZAezOcXnnvOC
    TXeW8JMRgQdbmcQBggjplA4be55nRyNaHq9iPhFMmKXEa7W9k/ySHMyyz+2W/l07
    brRMQzTlhSLJBcfiIeqQFw0lpaqoNOidWOOaJsOiTpB7xfv6dGwdqCX4jmvJtWdm
    EVISUdfEQuC0RnYVVNLkdR31L4PnTucY+eaeXLB/NrW+iT1TIic5ByTlb+B0ARvp
    i1BKR7jDpa+HLBa9OD6KbrGCf/jVnYwhFvDF2+3iWuKfPWyeuzjG+swpOi+hlXh8
    F8gNDAq0LjIKaeHVdpq+P1sm7ttuc1fWigEUi8GgGpuCJYO7whBShQ==
    =S3rl
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

     

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel

This site is protected with Urban Giraffe's plugin 'HTML Purified' and Edward Z. Yang's Powered by HTML Purifier. 2967 items have been purified.