<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avatar: a hero for Na&#8217;vis &#8211; half a millenium ago</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/avatar-a-hero-for-navis-half-a-millenium-ago/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/avatar-a-hero-for-navis-half-a-millenium-ago</link>
	<description>helping you to save the world... &#38; some of your tax money;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:57:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mazsa</title>
		<link>http://theunitedpersons.org/blog/avatar-a-hero-for-navis-half-a-millenium-ago/comment-page-1#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>mazsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunitedpersons.org/?p=552#comment-144</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hudgins could argue that the analogy with the Kelo decision doesn’t make sense because this is tribal property, not individual property. OK. So imagine that some civilization more technologically advanced than ours discovers that there’s a rare mineral below the hills and mountains of Yosemite, which, in a sense, is tribal property. Our government has refused to sell. To get at the mineral, this other &quot;civilization&quot; must blast and bulldoze Yosemite down to nothing. If that more advanced group comes in and uses violence to grab Yosemite, would Hudgins say that was fine? I think not.&quot; http://original.antiwar.com/henderson/2010/01/10/in-defense-of-avatar/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hudgins could argue that the analogy with the Kelo decision doesn’t make sense because this is tribal property, not individual property. OK. So imagine that some civilization more technologically advanced than ours discovers that there’s a rare mineral below the hills and mountains of Yosemite, which, in a sense, is tribal property. Our government has refused to sell. To get at the mineral, this other &#8220;civilization&#8221; must blast and bulldoze Yosemite down to nothing. If that more advanced group comes in and uses violence to grab Yosemite, would Hudgins say that was fine? I think not.&#8221; <a href="http://original.antiwar.com/henderson/2010/01/10/in-defense-of-avatar/" rel="nofollow">http://original.antiwar.com/henderson/2010/01/10/in-defense-of-avatar/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

